Predicting Precipitates: A Double Displacement Homework Exercise

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solubility
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on predicting the formation of precipitates in double displacement reactions. The first combination, barium hydroxide and ammonium phosphate, produces barium phosphate as a solid precipitate. The second combination, silver nitrate and potassium acetate, results in silver acetate precipitating out. The third combination, copper(I) sulfate and sodium chloride, yields copper(I) chloride as a solid. Overall, the homework attempts correctly identify the precipitates formed in each reaction.
STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



Which of the following combinations of compounds will produce a precipitate?

1. Barium hydroxide and ammonium phosphate
2. Silver nitrate and potassium acetate
3. Copper(I) sulfate and sodium chloride

Homework Equations



Double displacement.

The Attempt at a Solution



1. ##3(Ba(OH)_2 )_{aq} + 2((NH_4)_3 PO_4)_{aq} → Ba_3((PO_4 )_2)_{s} + 6(NH_4 OH)_{aq}##

The solid precipitate formed will be barium phosphate.

2. This one I'm a bit unsure about because of the potassium acetate.

##(AgNO_3)_{aq} + (KC_2H_3O_2)_{aq} → (AgC_2H_3O_2)_{s} + (KNO_3)_{aq}##

The solid precipitate formed will be silver acetate.

3. ##(Cu_2SO_4)_{aq} + 2(NaCl)_{aq} → 2(CuCl)_{s} + (Na_2SO_4)_{aq}##

The sold precipitate formed will be copper(I) chloride.

Do these look okay? I want to make sure I'm doing these properly.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top