Preparing for a QFT Course with One Semester of Quantum

AI Thread Summary
One semester of quantum mechanics, particularly at the Griffiths level, may not provide sufficient preparation for a Quantum Field Theory (QFT) course like Peskin & Schroeder. A deeper understanding of quantum mechanics is often necessary, including familiarity with the Dirac equation, scattering theory, and spin in quantum contexts. Mastery of Green functions, complex integration, and foundational concepts such as the harmonic oscillator and Dirac notation is crucial for success in QFT. While it is possible to engage with QFT without a solid quantum background, the understanding may remain superficial, limiting the ability to grasp the underlying concepts. Supplementing Peskin's text with resources like Mandl and Shaw, Schrednicki, and Ryder can enhance comprehension. Griffiths' introduction to particle physics also offers valuable insights into QFT fundamentals.
lion8172
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Is one semester of quantum sufficient preparation for a QFT course?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What level was your quantum class at and what level is the QFT being taught at?
 
The quantum class was at the level of Griffiths, and the QFT class is at the level of Peskin & Schroeder.
 
You will struggle in my opinion (under the assumption that you didn't spend too much time outside of Griffiths studying). I personally feel you need to really dig into QM a couple times before you start really feeling comfortable with it.

As an undergrad I was in your same position. My research adviser really wanted me to take his QFT class because it would have been super useful to me to have seen it for the research I was doing. In the end he decided against it for many reasons: You really should have seen the dirac equation, scattering theory, dealt with spin in QM context extensively, etc.

But only you know if you feel you are ready.
 
You will need to be very comfortable with Green functions and complex integration. Also, a solid quantum foundation in the harmonic oscillator and dirac notation. It can be done without a solid background in quantum...but to a certain extent your understanding will be superficial...i.e you could probably perform the calculations, but the context will be muddled.

I'm not too fond of peskin personally. I think if you used 'Mandl and Shaw' ,'Schrednecki' and Ryder to compliment Peskin then you might be ok. Also, Griffiths Intro to particle physics has a nice introductory section into QFT somewhere around chptr 11 I think. Introduces the QFT lagrangian for a scalar field and the Euler lagrange eqtns.
 
There's an interesting blog post by "Flip Tomato" here.
He writes about how to learn QFT as an undergraduate including prerequisites.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
186
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top