Schools Preparing for E&M physics (2nd Semester College Physics).

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on seeking recommendations for supplementary texts for Electricity and Magnetism (E&M) to complement Halliday and Resnick's physics course. The user successfully used Schaum's and Kleppner and Kolenkow's mechanics books previously, leading to a strong performance in their first semester. They express concern about their lack of experience with vector calculus, having only completed Calc II, and inquire about managing both E&M and vector calculus simultaneously. Responses reassure that the second section of Halliday & Resnick is manageable, even for those with limited calculus experience, and suggest that many find Calc III easier than Calc II. Overall, the community offers support and advice for navigating the upcoming semester.
1stepatatime
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I made a similar post to this last semester when I went onto take my Introduction to Mechanics (1st semester of College Physics) course and asked for some books that will give me some insight to supplement the first few sections of the Halliday and Resnick (1-15, 8th edition) text. I used Schaum's and the "An Introduction to Mechanics" by Kleppner and Kolenkow, which gave a deeper insight into basic Newtonian Mechanics and not only did they help, but I ended up enjoying all three. I was able to finish with a strong A in the class (I was extremely excited), and now and am looking forward to the next semester. So much thanks once again for helping me out, :smile:.

So my first question is, aside from Schaum's are there any other recommended texts/guides/books for starting E&M (middle sections of Halliday and Resnick) physics? I'm also at a slight disadvantage since I have little to no conceptual experience with these two subjects, so maybe a recommended book for that as well?

I was doing a little research, and saw that I will encounter vector calculus. I just finished Calc II (earned a solid A as well) which had no vector calculus at all. I realize that this puts me at a disadvantage compared to other students who have completed Calc III, but has anybody found it completely overwhelming to take both at the same time? I expect the math to be rigorous and understand if you don't follow the math, it makes the physics that much (even more) difficult.

Sorry for the long text, but as you can tell I'm nervous (even more this time) about this semester coming up. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't worry too much. The second section of Halliday & Resnick (if that's what you're using second semester as well) isn't too rough with vector calculus. We used it in my high-school AP class and although most of the students were only in Calc I or II (AB or BC) my physics teacher was capable of teaching everyone the necessary math. Additionally, many people (myself included) find Calc III easier to learn than Calc II, because it largely involves applying familiar concepts of derivation/integration to three dimensions.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top