Prerequisites needed to grasp analytical mechanics.

AI Thread Summary
A solid understanding of calculus, including vector calculus, and linear algebra is essential for grasping analytical mechanics. While knowledge of differential geometry, topology, and manifolds can enhance comprehension, they are not strictly necessary for an initial encounter with the subject. It is advisable to focus on the physical concepts first before delving into advanced mathematical frameworks. Familiarity with the physics will provide a foundation for later studies in more complex mathematical areas. Ultimately, the approach should align with individual goals and current understanding.
amjad-sh
Messages
240
Reaction score
13
1.What are the mathematical prerequisites needed to grasp analytical mechanics conceptually and technically?

2.To understand the very concept of analytical mechanics, do I need to train my self in Euclidean and Riemannian manifolds, and do I need to have good knowledge in topology and differential geometry?

Hope I would get good answers, and thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it depends a lot on your goals and your current level of understanding. For a first encounter with analytical mechanics, I believe you can learn a lot without differential geometry, but with a good understanding of calculus (including vector calculus) and linear algebra. In fact, I would recommend that you focus on the physics first and, after you have familiarised yourself with this and are interested, proceed to learn more about formulations using modern differential geometry and topology.
 
  • Like
Likes amjad-sh and vanhees71
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top