Pressure at surface and bottom of pool

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taniaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Surface
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding pressure differences in two pools with varying surface areas but equal depths. At the surface of both pools, the pressure is equal to atmospheric pressure, resulting in a ratio of 1. At the bottom, despite pool A having a larger surface area, the pressure remains the same due to equal depth, confirming that surface area does not affect pressure. Additionally, the conversation delves into the behavior of a cube submerged in a liquid, clarifying that if the cube's density is less than the liquid's, the rod holding it down experiences tension, while if the cube's density is greater, the rod is under compression. The key takeaway is that buoyancy and the forces acting on submerged objects dictate the tension and compression in supporting structures.
Taniaz
Messages
364
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Two pools A and B have exactly the same depth, but A has 10 times the surface area, both at the top and at the bottom. Find the ratio of the total pressure (a) at the top surface of A to that at the top surface of B
(b)at the bottom of A to that at the bottom of B.

Homework Equations


P=F/a or P=pgh

The Attempt at a Solution


For a, since they're at the surface they both have a pressure = atmospheric pressure so the ratio is 1?
For b, since they're at the same depth, they have the same pressure because even if the area of A is 10 times the area of B, that means there's a force of about 10 times as big acting on the area as well so the pressure is the same. Is my reasoning correct? I don't see how the area affects part a? I mean the force and area at the surface for both will change in a way that their pressure will equal the atmospheric pressure. Do I need to consider atmospheric pressure in b as well? Even then, the ratio would be 1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. Surface area has nothing to do with pressure. (If they asked for total force, not pressure, then area would count for something.)
 
Thank you!

Just one more thing. We have a cube immersed fully in a liquid where the density of the liquid is p1 and the density of the cube is po. The cube is linked to the bottom of the container of the liquid by a rod. If p1 > po then the body would want to float so the net force would be upwards hence the rod would be under tension. If p1 < po then the body would want to sink so the net force would be downwards hence the rod will be under compression. If p1=po then it's neutrally stable, so it will move wherever, hence the rod will be under compression or will it be under nothing? Am I right with these 3?
 
Assuming the rod is thin enough, then you are correct. When p1 = po, the buoyant force cancels the object's weight, so it doesn't add any tension to the rod.
 
Yes that makes sense, so it won't be under any compression or tension? Thank you!

I was just worried about this one:

If p1 < po then the body would want to sink so the net force would be downwards hence the rod will be under compression.
 
Taniaz said:
Yes that makes sense, so it won't be under any compression or tension? Thank you!

I was just worried about this one:

If p1 < po then the body would want to sink so the net force would be downwards hence the rod will be under compression.
That is correct too.
 
Thank you Doc Al and Haruspex for your help :)
 
Hi again!

This particular question that I asked a few months ago (in reply number 3):

"We have a cube immersed fully in a liquid where the density of the liquid is p1 and the density of the cube is po. The cube is linked to the bottom of the container of the liquid by a rod. If p1 > po then the body would want to float so the net force would be upwards hence the rod would be under tension. If p1 < po then the body would want to sink so the net force would be downwards hence the rod will be under compression."

Wouldn't the rod be under compression if the body wanted to float since the rod is trying to keep the body down?
And wouldn't it be under tension if the body wanted to sink?
 
Taniaz said:
Wouldn't the rod be under compression if the body wanted to float since the rod is trying to keep the body down?
And wouldn't it be under tension if the body wanted to sink?
Just the opposite. If the body wanted to float it would be stretching the rod; if it wanted to sink, it would be compressing the rod.
 
  • #10
How will it be stretching the rod?
 
  • #11
Taniaz said:
How will it be stretching the rod?
When the cube pulls up on the rod, it stretches the rod creating tension. (You could replace the rod with a rope.)
 
  • #12
I can't seem to get my head around this, wouldn't the rod be pulling the rod when it would want to sink and pushing against the rod when it would want to float?
The rod is what is keeping the cube to the bottom of the liquid so it would push on the rod when it would want to float? :frown:
 
  • #13
Forget about the fluid for a minute. Remove the liquid. You have a cube sitting on top of a rod. Is the rod compressed or stretched?
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
  • #14
Taniaz said:
I can't seem to get my head around this, wouldn't the rod be pulling the rod when it would want to sink and pushing against the rod when it would want to float?
The rod is what is keeping the cube to the bottom of the liquid so it would push on the rod when it would want to float? :frown:
Maybe you are confusing yourself by thinking in terms of what the cube "wants".
What the cube does is a consequence of the forces acting on it. If it does not move then those forces must be in balance.
The pressure in the liquid is greater at greater depths, so it pushes more strongly on the underside of the cube than on top. That is what creates the buoyant force. When the liquid is dense the buoyant force is strong. If it exceeds the gravitational force on the cube then to balance the buoyant force the rod must pull down on the cube.
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
Back
Top