Pressure drop in pipe due to bends and/or pressure reducing valves ?

AI Thread Summary
To achieve a pressure drop from 140-150 bars to 2 bars in a 1-2 meter copper pipe using nitrogen, using only bends may not be sufficient for such a significant reduction. A pressure reducing valve is recommended as it can effectively maintain the desired outlet pressure. Incorporating both bends and a pressure reducing valve could optimize performance, depending on the specific design requirements. Calculations for pressure drop can vary based on the chosen diameter and flow rate, so assumptions should be made within standard ranges. A back pressure regulator is suggested as a reliable solution if budget allows, with industrial options available from manufacturers like Fisher and Jordan.
AKapoor
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am currently doing my final year project and have a few queries. I would be really grateful if someone could answer the following questions for me as soon as possible.
• The requirement is to drop the pressure from 140-150 bars at the inlet of a pipe to 2 bars at the outlet of the pipe.
• The pressure of 2 bars is to be maintained at the outlet of pipe.
• The pipe length is 1-2 metres long.
• Pipe is made of copper or a copper alloy.
• The pressurized gas used is Nitrogen.
• The pipe diameter is not fixed yet and can be varied (but is to be kept as small as possible).

Please answer the following questions for me:
• Can the pressure drop be achieved using only bends in the pipe?
• Would using a pressure reducing valve be a better option?
• Or should both of the above options be considered?
• For any option chosen please let me know the calculations involved. The unknown variables can be assumed over a standard range.

Thanking you,

Anshuman
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you have enough money in the project, a "back pressure regulator" is your best choice.

Fisher and Jordan make industrial strength regulators. You may be able to find something cheaper if you need.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top