Pressure gradient causes conservative force?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the force accelerating a fluid between two points of different pressure is conservative. It is established that while the force per unit volume, represented as -∇P, suggests a conservative nature due to the vector identity ∇ × ∇P = 0, real fluids also experience viscous damping forces that make the overall forces non-conservative. The analysis indicates that the pressure gradient component could be seen as conservative, but the presence of viscosity alters this classification. Additionally, the discussion touches on how these forces relate to gravity and can be used to derive Archimedes' principle. Ultimately, the conclusion is that the forces in a liquid are non-conservative despite the conservative aspect of the pressure gradient.
Alkmini Moschoviti
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Is the force that accelerates afluid betwen two points of different pressure conservative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A very interesting question. Since the force per unit volume is ## \vec{f}_v=-\nabla P ## , and ## \nabla \times \nabla P=0 ##, (a vector identity that is commonly known from E&M theory), you might think that could be possible. In a real fluid however, there will also be viscous damping forces on the volume that are part of the total force equation that are often left out of the equation ## \vec{f}_v=-\nabla P ##. ## \\ ## So that the answer is the forces in a liquid are non-conservative, even though the part that comes from the minus of the pressure gradient could be considered to be conservative. ## \\ ## Note: This is my own analysis=others may agree or disagree=this is the first time I have encountered this question. ## \\ ## Additional note: You could think of these forces as acting on a small object of finite volume that is placed in the fluid. (And of course gravity will also act on the object, which is a conservative force).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Alkmini Moschoviti
Thank you so much for your answer
It is clear
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
Alkmini Moschoviti said:
Thank you so much for your answer
It is clear
I added one more part above, about the force of gravity on an object in the fluid=be sure and see that. ## \\ ## Additional item: There is a vector identity, ## \int \nabla P \, d^3 x=\int P \, \hat{n} dA ##, (where ## \hat{n} ## is the outward pointing normal), and to have equilibrium, ## -\delta g \, \hat{z}+-\nabla P= 0 ##, (where ## \delta ## is the density (mass per unit volume)), so that you can actually derive Archimedes' principle from the pressure gradient force.
 
  • Like
Likes Alkmini Moschoviti
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top