Pressure in Fluids: What's Really Going On?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding fluid pressure in a system with two pipes at different heights. It highlights that the pressure at the same height in both pipes should be equal, factoring in atmospheric pressure and the height difference. The conversation clarifies that while water itself is not compressible, the pressure exerted by the air above it influences the water's behavior. The participants emphasize that when discussing fluid at rest, it refers to the overall movement rather than the motion of individual particles. The need for a clearer explanation of pressure in terms of forces is also expressed, indicating a desire for deeper understanding.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Suppose I have a fluid in a system like the one on the picture. The fluid is lower in one of the pipes because the pressure in this pipe is bigger than the atmospheric pressure.
But is it then so that the pressure in the top of the water of pipe 1 equals the pressure of the water in the same level in pipe 2?
I really have a hard time understanding pressure in fluids. I mean how can you talk about for instance the pressure being bigger in the bottom of a fluid because it is a rest - indeed the fluid is not at rest since the particles in it are continuously moving around..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what picture you are talking about, but if I am not mistaken the water would not actually compress(I don't think you can have compressed water under normal circumstances, but I am probably wrong), but rather the air in the pipe is pressurized. When the air is pressurized it will try to expand, so to speak. Since the air and water can not occupy the same space, the air will push the water out of the way. So, in summary, if I am not mistaken the water itself does not have a pressure, but rather the pressurized air exerts a force on the water. As for your last question, I believe when we say the water is at rest we are not referring to anything as small as particles, but as a whole. By that logic no object is ever at rest. I think when we say water in a cup is at rest, it simply means the water is not moving around in the cup(but the particles the water consist of are). I hope that helps.
Edit: didn't read the op too well, for some reason I thought you were talking about water, so what I said probably doesn't apply here.
 
okay thanks. I forgot to attach the picture so here it is. Does that make you change explanation? Indeed the pressure on the surface of the water in pipe 1 must be as big as the upwards pressure from the water below. But is this pressure then equal to ρgh, where h is the difference in height between the water in the two pipes?
 

Attachments

  • fluid.png
    fluid.png
    4.7 KB · Views: 490
The pressure on the surface of the liquid in tube 1 is equal to
\rho g h + P_{atm}
\rho g h is the pressure difference.
 
nasu said:
The pressure on the surface of the liquid in tube 1 is equal to
\rho g h + P_{atm}
\rho g h is the pressure difference.

Hmm how can I realize that is true? Can you show me in terms of forces..? :)
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Does Fluid Dynamics Explain Pressure Gradients in a Frictionless Tube?
Replies
48
Views
6K
Understand Pressure in Fluids: Conceptual Guide
Replies
3
Views
2K
Would the velocity of a fluid increase right after exiting a pipe into open air?
Replies
13
Views
4K
Why does fluid pressure decrease with higher density in narrow pipes?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Rocket propulsion explained only through pressure differential
Replies
46
Views
5K
Speed and pressure relative to a piston (fluids)
Replies
3
Views
4K
Inertial Force in Fluid Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
5K
What is the relationship between fluid pressure and the Venturi effect?
Replies
1
Views
2K
I A specific case of an exception to Archimedes' Principle?
Replies
40
Views
4K
Is there any pressure inside the free falling fluid?
Replies
2
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top