Pressure in Fluids: What's Really Going On?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid Pressure
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding fluid pressure in a system with two pipes at different heights. It highlights that the pressure at the same height in both pipes should be equal, factoring in atmospheric pressure and the height difference. The conversation clarifies that while water itself is not compressible, the pressure exerted by the air above it influences the water's behavior. The participants emphasize that when discussing fluid at rest, it refers to the overall movement rather than the motion of individual particles. The need for a clearer explanation of pressure in terms of forces is also expressed, indicating a desire for deeper understanding.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
Suppose I have a fluid in a system like the one on the picture. The fluid is lower in one of the pipes because the pressure in this pipe is bigger than the atmospheric pressure.
But is it then so that the pressure in the top of the water of pipe 1 equals the pressure of the water in the same level in pipe 2?
I really have a hard time understanding pressure in fluids. I mean how can you talk about for instance the pressure being bigger in the bottom of a fluid because it is a rest - indeed the fluid is not at rest since the particles in it are continuously moving around..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what picture you are talking about, but if I am not mistaken the water would not actually compress(I don't think you can have compressed water under normal circumstances, but I am probably wrong), but rather the air in the pipe is pressurized. When the air is pressurized it will try to expand, so to speak. Since the air and water can not occupy the same space, the air will push the water out of the way. So, in summary, if I am not mistaken the water itself does not have a pressure, but rather the pressurized air exerts a force on the water. As for your last question, I believe when we say the water is at rest we are not referring to anything as small as particles, but as a whole. By that logic no object is ever at rest. I think when we say water in a cup is at rest, it simply means the water is not moving around in the cup(but the particles the water consist of are). I hope that helps.
Edit: didn't read the op too well, for some reason I thought you were talking about water, so what I said probably doesn't apply here.
 
okay thanks. I forgot to attach the picture so here it is. Does that make you change explanation? Indeed the pressure on the surface of the water in pipe 1 must be as big as the upwards pressure from the water below. But is this pressure then equal to ρgh, where h is the difference in height between the water in the two pipes?
 

Attachments

  • fluid.png
    fluid.png
    4.7 KB · Views: 489
The pressure on the surface of the liquid in tube 1 is equal to
\rho g h + P_{atm}
\rho g h is the pressure difference.
 
nasu said:
The pressure on the surface of the liquid in tube 1 is equal to
\rho g h + P_{atm}
\rho g h is the pressure difference.

Hmm how can I realize that is true? Can you show me in terms of forces..? :)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top