Pressure in Gases: Boiling Water in a Can Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZiHao
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gases Pressure
Click For Summary
Boiling water in a can creates steam that displaces air, resulting in lower pressure inside the can. When the can is inverted and placed in cold water, the steam rapidly condenses back into liquid, significantly reducing the volume and creating a partial vacuum. This vacuum is much stronger than if only the air had been cooled, as the volume change from steam to water is greater than that of air. The atmospheric pressure outside the can then crushes it due to the imbalance created. Heating the water is essential for generating steam to effectively displace air and create a stronger vacuum upon condensation.
ZiHao
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
A teacher heats some water in a drinks can until it is boiling and steam comes out of the can. She quickly turns the can over and puts it into some water. Explain in detail why the can collapses.

My solution will be: By boiling the water, the water changes state from liquid to gas, which is water vapor. The water vapor pushes the air that was originally inside the can out into the atmosphere. So there is less air and water in the can, but the water vapor in the can can still balance the atmospheric pressure, as it is hot means more particle collisions and higher pressure. When the can is turned upside down and placed in the water, all the water vapor quickly condense into drops of liquid in the can, this decreases the pressure. And so the much higher atmospheric pressure crush the can.

My questions is: Why can't we just put the can into the cold water? Why do we need to heat the water in it before? Can someone explain the whole process in detail, I don't completely understand the experiment. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ZiHao said:
My questions is: Why can't we just put the can into the cold water? Why do we need to heat the water in it before? Can someone explain the whole process in detail, I don't completely understand the experiment.
Your second paragraph explains the process very well. As you say, you need to fill the can with steam and displace the air. When you cool the can the steam condenses and creates a partial vacuum. If you just cooled the air without displacing it, the partial vacuum would not be sufficient to crush the can. The change in volume from steam at 100 °C to water at 10 °C is much much greater than the change in volume of air from 100 °C to air at 10 °C.
 
  • Like
Likes ZiHao
The purpose of heating the water in the can is we need to fill the can with steam and displace the air, because the steam has higher temperature than air therefore more particle collision and higher pressure in the can. So when we cool the can , steam condenses to water, it takes up much less volume in the can than just cooling the air down if we have not heat the water in the can. And comparing heated water and place into the cold water, to just straight away put the can into the cold water, creating a low pressure environment ( as the steam condenses to water, there is less particles to collide with the wall of the can ), therefore a higher quality vacuum. Right?
 
For fun I was trying to use energy considerations to determine the depth to which a solid object will sink in a fluid to reach equilibrium. The first approach that I tried was just to consider the change in potential energy of the block and the fluid as the block is lowered some unknown distance d into the fluid similar to what is shown in the answer to this post. Upon taking the limit as the vessel's cross sectional area approaches infinity I have an extra factor of 2 in the equilibrium...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?