Pressure questions filling smaller tank from larger

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jynx18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pressure Tank
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of filling smaller tanks from a larger high-pressure tank, specifically focusing on the calculations involved in determining the pressure after each fill. The context includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning related to gas behavior under pressure changes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to understand how to calculate the pressure in tank A after filling smaller tanks B, noting that the initial volume ratio does not directly translate to the number of fills.
  • Another participant suggests that using a compressor is necessary to achieve the required pressure for filling tank B.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about their calculations and seeks clarification on the pressure changes after each fill without a compressor.
  • One participant calculates the pressure drop after the first fill, assuming the tanks are initially at vacuum and using the combined volume to derive the new pressure, while also considering temperature effects.
  • Another participant challenges the interpretation of volume loss, suggesting that it is more accurate to consider the mass of gas rather than volume when discussing the pressure changes.
  • A participant acknowledges their misunderstanding regarding the gas behavior during filling and corrects their terminology regarding the transfer of gas between tanks.
  • One participant applies Boyle's Law to derive the pressure after filling, arriving at a specific gauge pressure while noting the assumption of constant temperature.
  • Another participant points out that in reality, the temperature drop during gas expansion would lead to a further decrease in pressure beyond the calculated value.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of a compressor and the accuracy of pressure calculations. There is no consensus on the best approach to determine the pressure after each fill, and multiple competing interpretations of the gas behavior are present.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention assumptions regarding the initial state of the tanks (vacuum vs. atmospheric pressure) and the impact of temperature changes on pressure calculations, which remain unresolved.

Jynx18
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Ok I am wondering how to solve this or go about figuring it out. This is what I am trying to do.

I have a 253.859 cu inch tank (tank A) filled to 4500psi. I want to fill 68 cubic inch tanks (tanks B) with it. I know that after each fill tank A will decrease in pressure by a little amount and obviously tank B can only be filled to the same pressure as tank A since they would equal out. How can I go about this?

I know it is not as simple as tank A is ~3.7 times larger so it should fill 3.7 tanks
253.859/68=3.733

Could I do that after each fill it should lose 26.79% (1/3.733) of its pressure (since essentially 26.79% of volume is gone)?

Fill 1 3294.45 psi
Fill 2 2411.87 psi
Fill 3 1765.73 psi
Fill 4 1292.69 psi
Fill 5 946.34 psi
etc...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you can go around this without using a compressor for filling the tanks with the required pressure.
 
i understand that but i want to try and figure out what each fill would be with no compressor. i know it won't make sense to do this in real life but now it is bugging me because it seems so simple so figure out the pressures yet i am not 100% sure if the math i am doing is right.
 
Jynx18 said:
i understand that but i want to try and figure out what each fill would be with no compressor. i know it won't make sense to do this in real life but now it is bugging me because it seems so simple so figure out the pressures yet i am not 100% sure if the math i am doing is right.

If the content of the high pressure tank is a condensed or partially condensed gas, you are lucky as the pressure doesn't drop as long as the some liquid has remained in the tank.

However if the the content is all gaseous, then we can easily calculate the pressure at after each filling. I think your calculation is wrong. I calculate it for the first filling ( I hope I am not wrong in my calculation!):

First suppose the empty tank is really empty ( vacuum) . After connecting the tanks, the content of changes volume from 253.859 to 253.859+68=321.589 . Hence the volume has increased by factor321.589/253.859= 1.268 . The pressure drops by the same factor. The initial pressure is 4500+15 pis ( I added the atmospheric pressure to get the absolute pressure). The absolute pressure after the first filling then becomes 4515/1.268 =3556.782 psi absolute ≈ 3541.782 psi gauge. Here I assumed that the temperature remains constant. ( of course the temperature tends to drop by expansion but in case of a metallic tank, the it gets energy from the ambient and the temperature remains the same as the ambient temperature.

If the empty tank is not vacuum but atmospheric pressure, the pressure would be slightly higher. If you need it, i can calculate it.
 
Jynx18 said:
(since essentially 26.79% of volume is gone)

This part is wrong. First, the volume is gone is not the right statement. Perhaps you mean 26.79 % of the mass ( moles) has gone. Again this is not correct. The mass expands into both tanks first, then 68/(253.859+68)=.211 ( 21.%) of it is gone.
 
Hassan2 said:
If the content of the high pressure tank is a condensed or partially condensed gas, you are lucky as the pressure doesn't drop as long as the some liquid has remained in the tank.

However if the the content is all gaseous, then we can easily calculate the pressure at after each filling. I think your calculation is wrong. I calculate it for the first filling ( I hope I am not wrong in my calculation!):

First suppose the empty tank is really empty ( vacuum) . After connecting the tanks, the content of changes volume from 253.859 to 253.859+68=321.589 . Hence the volume has increased by factor321.589/253.859= 1.268 . The pressure drops by the same factor. The initial pressure is 4500+15 pis ( I added the atmospheric pressure to get the absolute pressure). The absolute pressure after the first filling then becomes 4515/1.268 =3556.782 psi absolute ≈ 3541.782 psi gauge. Here I assumed that the temperature remains constant. ( of course the temperature tends to drop by expansion but in case of a metallic tank, the it gets energy from the ambient and the temperature remains the same as the ambient temperature.

If the empty tank is not vacuum but atmospheric pressure, the pressure would be slightly higher. If you need it, i can calculate it.

I should have mentioned it is compressed air so all gas. Wow I know boyles law but didn't think to look at it as the volume is increasing as it is connected during filling but was thinking it is "removed" since it is leaving one tank. That clears it up a bunch.

Hassan2 said:
This part is wrong. First, the volume is gone is not the right statement. Perhaps you mean 26.79 % of the mass ( moles) has gone. Again this is not correct. The mass expands into both tanks first, then 68/(253.859+68)=.211 ( 21.%) of it is gone.

Yea I knew the wording was wrong but that was the best I thought to describe it using intuition which usually causes problems as you can see. Like before I was looking in terms of air leaving the tank that's why I said removed incorrectly. Thanks for the help.
 
ok using p1v1=p2v2 i did this

p1 = 4500psi + 14.7 psi - 4514.7 psi
v1 = 253.859 ci
p2 = ?
v2 = 253.859 ci + 68 ci = 321.859 ci

so p2 = 3560.9 psi and that is 3546.2 psi guage.
 
Last edited:
Yes, although that's assuming the temperature doesn't change. In reality, the temperature will drop as the gas is expanded, so the pressure will drop even farther than that (though the proportion of the gas transferred should still be the same).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 139 ·
5
Replies
139
Views
54K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K