I've been reading about principal components and residual matrixs.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It's my understanding if you used every principal component to recalculate your orginal data, then the residual matrix should be 0.

Therefore, I created a fake dataset of two random variables and calculated the principal components.

When I do eigenvector1,1*princomp1,1+Eigenvector1,2*princomp1,2 = var 1

similarly

When I do eigenvector2,1*princomp2,1+Eigenvector2,2*princomp2,2 = var 2

so therefore the residual matrix is 0 which is what I wanted. However, this is only true when I standardize the data.

If I don't standardized the data, the two formulas I listed above aren't true.

What is throwing me for a loop is none of the papers I read said anything about standardizing the data, but it looks like the data must be standardized for this to hold. I don't want to make any assumptions so I thought I would ask. Is this correct?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Principal Components and the Residual Matrix

Loading...

Similar Threads - Principal Components Residual | Date |
---|---|

Principal component analysis (PCA) with small number of observations | May 13, 2013 |

Principal ideals of rings without unity | Oct 19, 2011 |

On the ‘Sub-Additivity’ of Principal Eigenvectors | May 25, 2011 |

Principal ideals problem. | Apr 1, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**