Principal Ideal, Polynomial generators

nugget
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose R is an integral domain and I is a principal ideal in R[x], and I \neq {0}

a) Show I = <g(x)> for some g(x)\inR[x] that has minimal degree among all non-zero polynomials in I.

b) Is it necessarily true that I = <g(x)> for every g(x)\inR[x] that has minimal degree among all non-zero polynomials in I?

Homework Equations



Theorems, the division algorithm.

The Attempt at a Solution



For (a) we can take a g(x) of minimal degree as our generator; if deg(g) = 0, then g(x) is a unit in I and I = R[x], so we can assume deg(g)\geq1

Now we let f(x)\inI and apply the division algorithm.

f = qg + r, where q,r\inR[x] and deg(r)<deg(g)

This means that r = f - qg which is an element of I. By our choice of g having minimal degree, this means that r = 0. Otherwise r would be an element of I, and could be written as r = pg, p\inR[x]. (I'm not quite sure how best to explain the reasoning behind the fact that r must equal 0)

finishing the proof after this is fine.

b) I'm confused for this question, but I assume its a contradiction type answer, although I can't imagine a g(x) that wouldn't generate a principal ideal...

Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nugget said:
if deg(g) = 0, then g(x) is a unit in I

Why??

Now we let f(x)\inI and apply the division algorithm.

f = qg + r, where q,r\inR[x] and deg(r)<deg(g)

Did you prove that the division algorithm holds when R is simply an integral domain?

b) I'm confused for this question, but I assume its a contradiction type answer, although I can't imagine a g(x) that wouldn't generate a principal ideal...

Consider \mathbb{Z} and take the ideal generated by X+2. Then 2X+4 is in the ideal and is of minimal degree.
 
Hey,

regarding that deg(g)=0 bit, I guess I just assumed that a constant would be a unit in I. This would only be the case if R was a field, right?

Now I'm really confused for this question too; don't know how to prove the division algorithm, let alone for an integral domain.

I think I understand what you're saying for b)

Z is an integral domain so we can use that for R. b) is not true because <x+2> generates I and is of minimal degree, but <2x+4> can't generate I (it can't generate x+2, as Z doesn't contain fractions) but is also of minimal degree. Hence not every g(x) in R[x] of minimal degree generates I.
 
The trick for (a) is that you already know that I is principal. That is, you already know that I=<g(x)> for some g. The only thing you need to prove is that g is of minimal degree.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top