Pro Eng Wildfire & AutoCAD: Engineers' Opinions

  • Thread starter Thread starter i_wish_i_was_smart
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Pro-Engineer is favored for designing parts and mechanisms, while AutoCAD excels in building and civil designs, particularly for large-scale projects. Users find AutoCAD easier for space planning in big assemblies, although it is not recommended for 3D modeling. Solid Edge is noted as an intuitive alternative for solid modeling. Some users express frustration with AutoCAD's complexity, while Pro-Engineer is praised for its integrated analysis tools. Overall, the choice between these programs depends on the specific design needs.
i_wish_i_was_smart
Messages
91
Reaction score
1
now that i am in eng school, I'm learning to draft and to do it in pro eng autocad, in my opinion both remarkable programs its amazing, anyways i wanted to know engineers thoughts on those programs, advantages disadvantages of both, and how they compare in your eyes
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It depends on what you're designing.

Pro-Engineer is used for design of parts and mechanisms.

AutoCAD is used for building and civil designs (and other large scale projects)

I also find that AutoCAD is easier to do space planning for big assemblies, but don't waste your time doing anything 3-d in it.
 
'solid edge' is also a great intuitive solid modelling program

whatever you do, try to stay away from 'ideas'.. and if you have to use it.. use the unix based version (it'll still make your brain bleed)

pro eng W is prolly one of the best.. especially since you have all the analysis tools built right into it and at least, i think, integrated quite well
 
As Falcon, I use Solid Edge for 3D, and AutoCAD for 2D.

To say the truth, I had a lot of headaches trying to learn how the hell AutoCAD works. It seems to be alive!.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top