Probability distribution of the time interval between two cars

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the probability distribution of time intervals between consecutive cars on a highway, given that the probability of a car passing in a time interval dt is dt/τ, with τ set to 5 minutes. The initial approach involves using a Poisson distribution to calculate the probability of one car passing in a time T, leading to confusion about the mean value derived. Participants clarify that the probability density function (pdf) for the time until the next car is actually derived from considering the exponential decay of time intervals, resulting in a valid pdf. The final insights include a method for calculating the expected waiting time for an observer arriving at a random time, confirming that the mean time between cars is τ, as expected.
ENgez
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am trying to solve the following problem from Sethna's book on statistical mechanics (not homework).

On a Highway, the probability of a car passing in some interval dt is \frac{dt}{\tau}; \tau=5min.

what is the probability distribution of time intervals \Delta between two consecutive cars. and what is the mean of this distribution?

My attempt:
In a previous question, I derived the probability distribution for n cars to pass in an interval T

\rho_{car}(n)=\frac{1}{n!}(\frac{T}{\tau})^ne^{-\frac{T}{\tau}}

which I believe is correct, as the hint in the question said that I should get a Poisson distribution.

now if I input n=1 i get:

\rho_{car}(1)=\frac{T}{5}e^{-\frac{T}{5}}

this is the probability distribution for a single car to pass in a time interval T (at some time t<T).

according to my calculations the mean of this distributions is 50 minutes^2 which really doesn't make sense.

How do you solve this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you show your calculation in detail?
 
ENgez said:
this is the probability distribution for a single car to pass in a time interval T (at some time t<T).

according to my calculations the mean of this distributions is 50 minutes^2 which really doesn't make sense.
That is indeed the probability of exactly one car passing in time T, but in what sense is it a pdf (or cdf)? Its integral 0 to infinity is not 1.
Also, it's not clear to me how this is heading towards a solution of the problem. (There is a very easy way to solve it. Hint: think of reversing time.)
 
I don't get how reversing time can help...

But i tried approaching the problem in the most basic form possible:

suppose car A passes at t=0, we then begin counting time until the next car arrives. in each sliver of time dt there is a probability \frac{dt}{\tau} of a car passing and a probability 1-\frac{dt}{\tau}≈e^{\frac{-dt}{\tau}} of a car not passing.
n is the number of intervals of dt, for here we get (1) Δ=dt\cdot n.

thus, the chance of a car passing exactly after Δ minutes is (I hope...):

\frac{dt}{\tau}(e^{\frac{-dt}{\tau}})^{n-1}

after plugging (1) in (and taking the limit as n→∞) we get:

\frac{Δ}{\tau\cdot n}e^{\frac{-dt}{\tau}}

the problem is that when taking n→∞ the n in the denominator will cause the whole expression the go to 0 for all finite Δ, which kinda makes sense, because as dt gets smaller the probability of a car crossing at exactly that interval gets vanishingly small as well.

what am i doing wrong? and this is not a homework question, so feel free to share more than hints.

thank you
 
ENgez said:
I don't get how reversing time can help...
Yes, sorry, I was thinking of a slightly different question which usually gets asked. More on that later.
suppose car A passes at t=0, we then begin counting time until the next car arrives. in each sliver of time dt there is a probability \frac{dt}{\tau} of a car passing and a probability 1-\frac{dt}{\tau}≈e^{\frac{-dt}{\tau}} of a car not passing.
n is the number of intervals of dt, for here we get (1) Δ=dt\cdot n.

thus, the chance of a car passing exactly after Δ minutes is (I hope...):

\frac{dt}{\tau}(e^{\frac{-dt}{\tau}})^{n-1}
A slightly unconventional approach, but fine so far. We can treat n-1 as n, since n = Δ/δt will tend to infinity as δt shrinks to 0. And you may as well use t, not Δ, for the number of minutes elapsed. Your equation becomes:
\frac{dt}{\tau}(e^{\frac{-ndt}{\tau}}) = \frac{dt}{\tau}(e^{\frac{-t}{\tau}})
So that's the pdf of time to next car. The average is obtained by multiplying by t and integrating 0 to ∞.

The more usual method is to put n = 0 in your first equation to get the probability of no cars in time t. Then multiply by the probability of a car in time δt to get the prob of the first car being in interval (t, t+δt).
The problem I was thinking of was: you arrive at the road at a random instant. What is the expected length of time between the last car and the next?
 
Thank you!
I actually got the answer you provided, but what stumped me is that dt is supposed to be an infinitesimal interval. now i see that the probability of a car passing at exactly time t is zero, and that the pdf only gives out "real" values if integrated over some subset of intervals [t1,t2].

Btw, the question about arriving at a random time is the next one in the book, so thanks for the tip about reversing time.
 
for an observer arriving at a random time t_1, where t=0 is the time when the last car passed, i got the following pdf for \Delta^{*}- the time the observe waits until the next car:

\rho_{\Delta^*}=\frac{1}{\Delta^{*}}\cdot (e^{-\frac{-\Delta^{*}}{\tau}}-e^{-\frac{-2\Delta^{*}}{\tau}}).

the mean is \tau, like the book said and it goes to 0 for \Delta^{*}→0 and \Delta^{*}→∞, but it still looks kind of weird for a probability distribution... is this correct?
a short summary of the derivation:

\Delta^{*}=\Delta-t_1, where Δ is the time between two consecutive cars (as was found in the previous posts).

t_1 has a uniform probability distribution between 0 and Δ, therefore:

\rho_{\Delta^*}=\int{\rho_{\Delta}(\Delta^*+\zeta)\rho_{t_1}(\zeta) d\zeta}

for 0&lt;\zeta&lt;\Delta^*
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top