Probability of 5 Spin 1/2 Particles in No Magnetic Field

moknight
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider an ideal system of 5 non-interacting spin 1/2 particles in the absence of an external magnetic field. What is the probability that n of the five spins have spin up for each of the cases n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5?


Homework Equations


I'm guessing \frac{N!}{n!(N-n)!}


The Attempt at a Solution



I've done total number of arrangements Ω = \frac{N!}{n!(N-n)!}

done this for each case, n=0,1,2 etc.

Then p = \frac{1}{Ω} for the corresponding Ω to get the probability.

This is a guess and I'm not really sure if I'm going the right way.

I'm getting probability-like values, such as p=0.2 for cases n=1 and n=4.

p=0.1 for cases n=2, n=3.

Would appreciate some help.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moknight said:

Homework Statement


Consider an ideal system of 5 non-interacting spin 1/2 particles in the absence of an external magnetic field. What is the probability that n of the five spins have spin up for each of the cases n = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5?


Homework Equations


I'm guessing \frac{N!}{n!(N-n)!}


The Attempt at a Solution



I've done total number of arrangements Ω = \frac{N!}{n!(N-n)!}
This isn't the total number of arrangements. You have 5 particles, each of which can be in one of two state. How many arrangements can you make? This is just like asking how many outcomes you can get from flipping 5 coins.

You also need to figure out what ##\Omega## represents if it's not the total number of arrangements.

You may want to read about the binomial distribution again.
done this for each case, n=0,1,2 etc.

Then p = \frac{1}{Ω} for the corresponding Ω to get the probability.

This is a guess and I'm not really sure if I'm going the right way.

I'm getting probability-like values, such as p=0.2 for cases n=1 and n=4.

p=0.1 for cases n=2, n=3.

Would appreciate some help.

Thanks.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top