Probability of lights burning out in Series Circuit

AI Thread Summary
The probability of a string of four Christmas lights failing in a series circuit is calculated by first determining the probability that none of the bulbs fail. Each bulb has a 0.05 chance of failing, leading to a 0.95 chance of not failing. The probability that all four bulbs do not fail is (0.95)^4, which equals approximately 0.8145. Therefore, the probability that at least one bulb fails, causing the entire string to fail, is 1 - 0.8145, resulting in about 0.1855. This clarifies that the initial assumption of simply adding probabilities was incorrect.
lth2525
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, i have this question wrong in my intro statistics class and I'm wonder if someone could help me understand why. Thanks in advance.

Heres the question:

"A string of christmas lights contains 4 bulbs. The lights are wired in a series, so that if one fails, the whole sting would go dark. Each light has a probability of 0.05 of failing in a 3-year period. The lights fail independently of each other. What is the probability that a sting of lights will fail in a 3 year period?"

Now, my answer was 0.20, because each lights fail independetnly of each other, so then, if one fails, the others do not get a chance to fail. Since logically, w/o any external influence, a light bulb should not fail if it is not lit, therefore, 4 x .05 = 0.20. But i got the asnwer wrong, can someone help me to understand if I'm missing something? Thanks

On another note, can more than one light in a series circuit burn out at the same time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't add probabilities like that. Think about it, if you had 4 bulbs and each had a 0.25 probability of failing, you would get a 1 (100%) chance of failing for an answer and it is clear that this is not correct because it can still happen that none of the four fail. If you throw two coins, the chance that each will turn heads is 50%, but it's not 100% that at least one will :wink:

Try to think about it in a different way. What is the chance that a single lightbulb won't fail? Then, what is the chance that NONE of the bulbs will fail?
 
Last edited:
The probability of anyone bulb failing is 0.05 so the probability that anyone bulb WON'T fail is 0.95. The probability that NONE of the four lights will fail is (0.95)4= 0.81450625. Since the light string will fail is any of them does, that is the probability that the string will NOT fail so the probability that it will is 1-0.81450625= 0.18549375.
 
O, Ok, thanks for explaining that to me, i understand it now
 
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top