Probability of measuring the ground state of a particle (quantum mechanics)

AI Thread Summary
To find the probability of measuring the ground-state energy of a particle in an infinite potential well, the wave function is given as ψ(x,0) = Ax(a-x), where A is the normalization constant. The eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian are defined as φ_n = √(2/a) sin(nπx/a). The probability calculation involves the expression |⟨ψ|φ_n⟩|² for n=1, which simplifies to [∫₀ᵃ ψ φ₁ dx]². The initial calculation yielded a probability greater than 1, indicating an algebraic error, but the method itself is confirmed to be correct. The discussion emphasizes the importance of careful algebraic manipulation in quantum mechanics calculations.
BenR-999
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Have to find the probability of measureing the ground-state energy of a particle.
-in infinite potential well 0<x< a
has wave-function \psi (x,0) = Ax(a-x)
where a is the (known) length of the well, and the norm. const. A has already been found.

The eigenvalues of the hamiltonian in this potential are;
\phi_n = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} \sin(\frac{n \pi x}{a}})

I think that to do this i should take
\left| \langle \psi | \phi_n \rangle \right|^2
for n=1.

which becomes
\left[ \int^a_0 \psi \phi_1 dx \right] ^2 (as all are real-valued)

I'm not sure if this is correct..it just seems a little to simple.

(with A=\frac{ \sqrt{30} }{a^{5/2} }
i got 60/ \pi ^2 which is obviously incorrect..as it is greater than 1.
But, if the method is correct and i have just made algebra error?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, your method is correct, and you just made an algebra mistake.
 
beauty,
thanks mate
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top