Is P(x + a > y + b) Always 0.5 for Independent Variables?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Schlotkins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the probability question of whether P(x + a > y + b) equals 0.5 for independent random variables a, b, x, and y. The user believes that since P(a > b) and P(x > y) both equal 0.5, it follows that P(x + a > y + b) should also equal 0.5, but seeks proof without assuming a specific distribution type. A response suggests using characteristic functions to demonstrate that the distribution of S = x - y + a - b is symmetric, confirming the probability. The user acknowledges this approach and questions its applicability to a different probability scenario involving products of the variables.
Schlotkins
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Good evening:

I have a probability proof question that is driving me crazy. I feel
like I must have forgot an easy trick. Any help is GREATLY
appreciated. Here's the setup:

Let's assume a,b are indepedent random variables from cummulative
distribution F.


I think it's safe to say:


P( a > b) = .5


Now, let's assume x,y are independent random variables from CDF G.
Again:


P(x > y) = 0.5


Assume CDFs G and F are indepedent. Now it seems straightforward that:


P(x + a > y + b) = 0.5


but I don't know how to show it without assuming a distribution type.


Again, any help is appreciated.


Thank you,
Chris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are familiar with characteristic functions it is simple.
Let f and g be the characteristic functions of F and G.
Then S= x - y + a - b will have a ch. fcn. f(t)f(-t)g(t)g(-t).
This means that S has a symmetric distribution.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the tip and the response - I think I have it solved. On an aside, that trick wouldn't work for P(ax < by) right? It seems obvious that the P(ax - by < 0 ) = P (by - ax < 0)= .5, but of course characteristic functions are most useful for sums.

Thanks again for your assistance.
Chris
 
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...

Similar threads

Back
Top