MHB Probability Question about Affording Loaves

  • Thread starter Thread starter Byeongok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Byeongok
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
A bakery sells 3 types of bread: raisin at 2 dollars a loaf, sourdough at 3 dollars a loaf and white at 1.5 dollars a loaf. There are twice the number of white loaves than sourdough and equal numbers of sourdough and raisin. Lillian is in a hurry and randomly selects 2 loaves and takes them to the counter to pay.
Lillian only has 4 dollars in her purse.

Show suitable workings to find the probability that Lillian will be able to afford her 2 chosen loaves.

Lillian Purse = 4 dollars
2 Raisin = 4 dollars
2 Sourdough = 6 dollars
2 White bread = 3 dollars

1 Raisin = 1 Sourdough = 2 White
(She can’t afford 2 of sourdough)

Pr (Can’t afford 2 Loaves) = 1/4
Pr (Can afford 2 Loaves) = 3/4 b. State any assumptions you have made.

She has ¾ chance that she can afford 2 loaves of bread, and ¼ chance she can’t afford 2 loaves of bread.

EDIT: I DONT KNOW WHY THE FONTS ARE WEIRD FOR THE FIRST PART D:
EDIT2: FIXED
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Year10Student,

Welcome to MHB! :)

If we assume that she must pick two of the same kind, then you are correct.

Here's a way to do it through probability properties. We know that $$P(W)+P(S)+P(R)=1$$ because the sum of all possible probabilities must equal 1. We also know that $P(S)=P(R)$ as well as $2P(S)=P(W)$. Combining this into the first equation we get that $2P(S)+P(S)+P(S)=1$, which means $$4P(S)=1 \implies P(S)=\frac{1}{4}, P(R)=\frac{1}{4}, P(W)=\frac{1}{2}$$

She can afford two raisins or two whites, so if we add $P(R)+P(W)$ we indeed get $$\frac{3}{4}$$ and get $$\frac{1}{4}$$ for the sourdough, which she can't afford.

To do the problem this way we have assumed two things:

1) She will pick 2 loaves of the same kind of bread.
2) Each loaf is equally likely.
 
Jameson said:
Hi Year10Student,

Welcome to MHB! :)

If we assume that she must pick two of the same kind, then you are correct.

Here's a way to do it through probability properties. We know that $$P(W)+P(S)+P(R)=1$$ because the sum of all possible probabilities must equal 1. We also know that $P(S)=P(R)$ as well as $2P(S)=P(W)$. Combining this into the first equation we get that $2P(S)+P(S)+P(S)=1$, which means $$4P(S)=1 \implies P(S)=\frac{1}{4}, P(R)=\frac{1}{4}, P(W)=\frac{1}{2}$$

She can afford two raisins or two whites, so if we add $P(R)+P(W)$ we indeed get $$\frac{3}{4}$$ and get $$\frac{1}{4}$$ for the sourdough, which she can't afford.

To do the problem this way we have assumed two things:

1) She will pick 2 loaves of the same kind of bread.
2) Each loaf is equally likely.

Thanks for the reply!

but would it be possible to find out the probability of her being able to afford 2 loaves that aren't the same type?

For example, 1 sourdough and 1 white bread or 1 raisin and 1 white.

Its confusing!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top