Probability question - hypergeometric distribution?

AskingQ
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have never quite worked this type of probability question out, so would like some help please.

Imagine this scenario:
There are 4 people sat around a table, A, B, C and D.
A is sitting opposite C, B is sitting opposite D.
There is a bag with 16 balls numbered 1-16.
The balls are randomly drawn so that each person has 4 balls.

Imagine you are A.
And the balls you have are 1,4,5,9.

Now you want to work out what is the probability that C has a ball that is higher than your highest ball i.e. you want to work out whether C has AT LEAST one of 10,11,12,13,14,15, or 16.

Now the way I look at it is that the:
probability of C having ball 10 is 1/3
probability of C having ball 11 is 1/3
probability of C having ball 12 is 1/3
probability of C having ball 13 is 1/3
probability of C having ball 14 is 1/3
probability of C having ball 15 is 1/3
probability of C having ball 16 is 1/3

But I just don't know what to do next. Any assistance would be appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I would look at it this way. There are 7 balls that beat your 9, and 5 balls that lose. So if C is picking 4 balls at random from the other 12 balls available, what are his chances of not picking a ball that is greater than 9?
 
Ah. Ok. So basically you're saying that of the remaining 12 balls, the probability that C has at least one ball higher than my highest ball which is 9 is (1 - probability that C has all balls lower than mine).

Which comes to

1 - (5/12 * 4/11 * 3/10 * 2/9) = 1 - 120/11880 = 0.98...

That seems rather high to me, am I making a silly mistake somewhere?

Thanks.
 
AskingQ said:
Which comes to

1 - (5/12 * 4/11 * 3/10 * 2/9) = 1 - 120/11880 = 0.98...

That seems rather high to me, am I making a silly mistake somewhere?

Thanks.
You are making a silly mistake thinking it is high - look at the balls that are left and think about which combinations C could have that don't have any balls above 9,
 
AskingQ said:
Ah. Ok. So basically you're saying that of the remaining 12 balls, the probability that C has at least one ball higher than my highest ball which is 9 is (1 - probability that C has all balls lower than mine).

Which comes to

1 - (5/12 * 4/11 * 3/10 * 2/9) = 1 - 120/11880 = 0.98...

That seems rather high to me, am I making a silly mistake somewhere?

Thanks.

This is correct. Of the remaining balls, there is only 5 balls that are lower than 9. If C picks 4 random balls out of 12, it's hard for him to always pick out of those 5 which are lower than 9 and get none of the 7 balls that are higher.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top