Probability using box and whisker

  • Thread starter Thread starter joel amos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Probability
joel amos
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
The question:
A box and whisker plot is made from the lengths of 39 salmon. No two lengths are the same. Two of the salmon are picked at random. What is the probability that they will both be longer than the lower quartile value.

My solution:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x

The x's stand for the 39 lengths. The underlined ones are (respectively) the minimum, lower quartile, median, upper quartile, and maximum. There are 29 x's above the lower quartile value (including the second x that was averaged to find that value). Therefore, the probability for the first pick would be 29/39. For the second pick, however, the quantities have been lowered by one since one salmon has already been picked. So the second probability is 28/38. When multiplied together, I got a final probability of 54.8% Is this correct, or am I somehow over-complicating the problem. What would you give as the answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would do the same.

If 1-2% do not matter, 0.75^2 = 56.3% gives a reasonable estimate.
 
Yeah, that's what a lot of people did. This was a standardized test open-ended question. I wonder which response they're looking for.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top