Probability: What are the odds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jellybean
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the client loss experienced by two company owners, Fred and Jeff, after a split, with Fred losing 235 clients and Jeff losing 285. The debate revolves around whether this loss is due to random variability or a significant anomaly. It is suggested that the situation can be analyzed using a binomial distribution, with probabilities for each owner losing clients. The total number of clients each started with was 1,000, which indicates that the losses may not be random if the original client base was low. Ultimately, understanding the context of the client numbers is crucial to determining the odds of such losses.
jellybean
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
My company split in two.
Two owners, Fred and Jeff. Each got half the clients.
Since then, Fred lost 235 clients and Jeff lost 285.
My co-worker says it's just random variability.
I says no way, that's one in a million.
What are the odds? What's the equation?
p.s. true story
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Randomness would assume this is a binomial distribution with probability p1 Fred will lose a client, probability p2 Jeff will lose a client. For large numbers those can be approximated by normal distributions but to do that you would need to know the total number of clients each one started with and I don't see how you can decide whether it was "random variability" or not without knowing how many clients there were to start with. If the original number of clients was not much more than 235+ 285= 520, this is probably not "random variability". If the original number of clients was much more, then it probably was.
 
Oops, you're right. I thought at first it was just a coin toss x 520.
In round numbers, the total was 2,000. So each began with 1,000 clients.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top