Stargazing Problem about calculating focal length of a telescope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a formula for calculating the focal length of a telescope, specifically focusing on a step in the derivation that involves the term -(1+b). The user seeks clarification on how this term is obtained from the previous equation, expressing confusion over a sign discrepancy in the second term. They understand the substitutions made but request a detailed walkthrough of the mathematical steps involved. The conversation highlights the importance of precise mathematical manipulation in optics. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for clear explanations in complex formula derivations.
Blacky&Imy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello!
I am preparing an exam about optics and I can't understand a formula.my problem is at the end of the second page (the explanation is in Italian, but the formulas are easy to read for everybody).
I can't understand how in the last step

f=R/2 - (1+b) * r^2/4R etc they found -(1+b)

can somebody help me please?
 

Attachments

  • page 1.png
    page 1.png
    11.2 KB · Views: 506
  • page 2.png
    page 2.png
    6.2 KB · Views: 519
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Are you asking how they mathematically got from the previous equation to the last one?
 
yes. I understand what is substituted in what, but I get a different sign in the second term, and I'd like to see all the passages...
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top