Problem calculating the atomic weight of an isotope.

AI Thread Summary
Boron has two isotopes, 10B and 11B, with 80.22% of boron atoms being 11B, which has an atomic weight of 11.009 amu. The natural atomic weight of boron is given as 10.81 amu, leading to the calculation of the atomic weight of 10B. By setting up the equation based on the percentage composition and known weights, the unknown weight (W) can be solved. The calculation shows that the atomic weight of 10B is approximately 10.01 amu. This method effectively demonstrates how to derive the atomic weight of an isotope using the known ratios and weights.
ihaveabutt
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Boron has two naturally occurring isotopes, lOB and 11B. We know that 80.22% of its atoms are 11B, atomic weight 11.009 amu. From the natural atomic weight given on the inside back cover, calculate the atomic weight of the lOB isotope.
Solution
If 80.22% of all boron atoms are 11B, then 100.00 - 80.22, or 19.78%, are the unknown isotope. We can use W to represent the unknown atomic weight in our calculation:
(0.8022 x 11.009) + (0.1978 x W) = 10.81 amu (natural atomic weight)
W = (10.81-8.831)/0.1978 = 10.01 amu

On the part “(0.8022 x 11.009) + (0.1978 x W) = 10.81 amu (natural atomic weight),” how do I know what to multiply 0.1978 by if W is unknown? How did they arrive at 10.81?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi youhaveabuttandamazinglgysodoI
They didn't 'arrive' at 10.81, 10.81 is a given, it was measured, presumably.
W is the unknown and is multiplied by its known ratio so as to put the equation that is then solved

Cheers...
 
OK! This is done like this.

80.22% B atoms weight 11.009 amu and the other 19.78% weight let's say "m".

So we can construct a statement using all the data given and that is;

\frac{11.009\;amu\;×\;80.22\;+\;m\;amu\;×\;19.78}{100} = 10.81 amu

11.009 × 80.22 = 883.1

\frac{(883.1\;amu\;+\;m19.78\;amu)\;×\;100}{100} = 1081 amu

m19.78 amu = (1081 - 883.1) amu

∴m = \frac{(1081 - 883.1)\;amu}{19.78}

So m comes as 10.005 ≈ 10.01 amu
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top