Problem finding height of a cliff

  • Thread starter Thread starter jfeyen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the height of a cliff based on the time it takes for a rock to hit the ground after being thrown straight up with an initial velocity. The subject area is kinematics, specifically dealing with projectile motion and free fall.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to determine the height of the cliff by first calculating the maximum height the rock reaches after being thrown. They express uncertainty about which equations to use and how to proceed with their calculations.
  • Some participants question the assumptions made about the final velocity of the rock at the bottom of its fall and suggest reconsidering the interpretation of the maximum height calculated.
  • Others raise questions about the implications of the calculated maximum height and how it relates to the total height of the cliff.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and clarifying assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the calculations, but there is no explicit consensus on the next steps to take.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of uncertainty regarding the acceleration due to gravity and its sign, as well as confusion about the meaning of the calculated maximum height in relation to the cliff's height.

jfeyen
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the height of a cliff if it takes 2.35 s for a rock to hit the ground when it is thrown straight up from the cliff with an initial velocity of 8.00 m/s


Homework Equations



acceleration of gravity: 9.80 m/s2 ; not sure if I need to use -9.8 instead.
the equations we've been given so far include:
v=v0+at
v2=v02+2a(x-x0)
x=x0+((v0+v)/2)t
x=x0+v0t+(1/2)at2
I'm having a hard time figuring out which formula(s) would be most helpful

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I have to find how high the rock went first so I can then subtract it from the total free-fall to the bottom of the cliff at the end to find the height of just the cliff, but I'm having difficulties knowing what to do first and where to plug things in.

If I use v2=v02+2a(x-x0) and plug in my initial velocity of 8 m/s and I'm guessing a final velocity of 0 m/s when it stops at the top before coming back down, and an acceleration of -9.8 m/s2? and an initial x of 0 I come up with a final x of 3.27 m.

Not sure if I'm on the right track at all but another place I thought about starting was using v=v0+at to find the time it took just to reach the top of the throw, right before the rock free-falls to the bottom. When I did that I put in 0 m/s for my final velocity = 8 m/s for my initial velocity + (-9.8) for the acceleration of gravity x my unknown of t and found the time for the rock to go up before starting to come back down to be .816 s. Meaning that the free-fall then took 2.35s-.816s= 1.53s.

This is where I'm now stuck. Not sure what to to with both/either of these starting points and where I'm going to be able to pinpoint just the height of the cliff. If someone could let me know if I'm on the right track at all or point me in the right direction I would be extremely grateful!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jfeyen, welcome to PF!

Your initial calculation of the height of the rock after the throw is correct. It reaches a maximum height of 3.27m above the cliff height. However, you may have come to realize that this isn't entirely useful. How else can you use this information?

Why do you think that the maximum velocity of the rock is zero at the bottom of the fall?
 
I'm really not sure what the 3.27m means except that the height of the cliff will be 3.27m less than the total free-fall of the rock from it's maximum height. Not sure how to get from point A to point B though.
I thought the velocity at the bottom of the fall would be zero due to the fact that the rock is stopped at that point, however that may be flawed logic. Do I need to think of it more as the velocity at the moment right before it stops? I'm not sure what to do with it though.
 
Let me ask you in a slightly different way: if you threw a ball in the air at 10m/s (releasing it at a height of 2m), what speed will it be traveling at when is passes 2m on its way back down?

And yes, your logic is floored as you suspect! And you have correctly corrected yourself. Essentially, you don't know what velocity it reaches the bottom at (although you can calculate it), but you shouldn't need to.
 
Thanks for your help! I think I have it from here. What a great resource though. I'll be sure to come back with any other questions I have in physics!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K