Problem finding height of a cliff

  • Thread starter Thread starter jfeyen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the height of a cliff from which a rock is thrown upwards with an initial velocity of 8.00 m/s and takes 2.35 seconds to hit the ground, the key steps involve determining the maximum height reached by the rock before it falls back down. The rock ascends to a height of 3.27 m above the cliff, but this value alone does not provide the cliff's height. The total time of flight includes both the ascent and descent, with the ascent taking approximately 0.816 seconds, leaving 1.53 seconds for the free fall. The final velocity at the bottom is not zero, as it is the speed just before impact, which can be calculated but is not necessary for finding the cliff height. The discussion emphasizes understanding the motion of the rock and using the correct equations to derive the cliff height effectively.
jfeyen
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the height of a cliff if it takes 2.35 s for a rock to hit the ground when it is thrown straight up from the cliff with an initial velocity of 8.00 m/s


Homework Equations



acceleration of gravity: 9.80 m/s2 ; not sure if I need to use -9.8 instead.
the equations we've been given so far include:
v=v0+at
v2=v02+2a(x-x0)
x=x0+((v0+v)/2)t
x=x0+v0t+(1/2)at2
I'm having a hard time figuring out which formula(s) would be most helpful

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I have to find how high the rock went first so I can then subtract it from the total free-fall to the bottom of the cliff at the end to find the height of just the cliff, but I'm having difficulties knowing what to do first and where to plug things in.

If I use v2=v02+2a(x-x0) and plug in my initial velocity of 8 m/s and I'm guessing a final velocity of 0 m/s when it stops at the top before coming back down, and an acceleration of -9.8 m/s2? and an initial x of 0 I come up with a final x of 3.27 m.

Not sure if I'm on the right track at all but another place I thought about starting was using v=v0+at to find the time it took just to reach the top of the throw, right before the rock free-falls to the bottom. When I did that I put in 0 m/s for my final velocity = 8 m/s for my initial velocity + (-9.8) for the acceleration of gravity x my unknown of t and found the time for the rock to go up before starting to come back down to be .816 s. Meaning that the free-fall then took 2.35s-.816s= 1.53s.

This is where I'm now stuck. Not sure what to to with both/either of these starting points and where I'm going to be able to pinpoint just the height of the cliff. If someone could let me know if I'm on the right track at all or point me in the right direction I would be extremely grateful!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jfeyen, welcome to PF!

Your initial calculation of the height of the rock after the throw is correct. It reaches a maximum height of 3.27m above the cliff height. However, you may have come to realize that this isn't entirely useful. How else can you use this information?

Why do you think that the maximum velocity of the rock is zero at the bottom of the fall?
 
I'm really not sure what the 3.27m means except that the height of the cliff will be 3.27m less than the total free-fall of the rock from it's maximum height. Not sure how to get from point A to point B though.
I thought the velocity at the bottom of the fall would be zero due to the fact that the rock is stopped at that point, however that may be flawed logic. Do I need to think of it more as the velocity at the moment right before it stops? I'm not sure what to do with it though.
 
Let me ask you in a slightly different way: if you threw a ball in the air at 10m/s (releasing it at a height of 2m), what speed will it be traveling at when is passes 2m on its way back down?

And yes, your logic is floored as you suspect! And you have correctly corrected yourself. Essentially, you don't know what velocity it reaches the bottom at (although you can calculate it), but you shouldn't need to.
 
Thanks for your help! I think I have it from here. What a great resource though. I'll be sure to come back with any other questions I have in physics!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top