Problem in inertial reference frame

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the mechanics of a pack on a frictionless truck bed and the conditions required for the pack to tip over. The key question involves why the normal force at the tipping point must pass through the center of gravity of the pack. It is clarified that this relationship is explained by the equivalence principle, which equates the horizontal acceleration of the truck with gravitational effects, leading to a scenario where the resultant force aligns with the center of gravity. The conversation highlights the complexity of visualizing forces in inertial frames and the importance of stability in determining tipping conditions. Ultimately, the connection between normal force and center of gravity is rooted in fundamental physics principles.
balest
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Well, in principle, this problem seems very easy but I don't know the exact explanation.Here we go. We have a truck and a pack in its back.The bed of the truck is frictionless and the pack is stopped by a small piece of wood of something like that. The size of the pack is whatever(for instance,base=2m^2, height=1,75m)and its mass is 2kg so the question is what is the minimum acceleration of the truck to turn over the pack. In the frame of the truck is easy for me to solve the problem but I don't know how to solve it in an inertial frame. What I want to know is why the normal force, in the exact moment when the pack begins to turn over, has to pass through the centre of gravity.Why? I'm mystified.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
balest said:
Well, in principle, this problem seems very easy but I don't know the exact explanation.Here we go. We have a truck and a pack in its back.The bed of the truck is frictionless and the pack is stopped by a small piece of wood of something like that. The size of the pack is whatever(for instance,base=2m^2, height=1,75m)and its mass is 2kg so the question is what is the minimum acceleration of the truck to turn over the pack. In the frame of the truck is easy for me to solve the problem but I don't know how to solve it in an inertial frame. What I want to know is why the normal force, in the exact moment when the pack begins to turn over, has to pass through the centre of gravity.Why? I'm mystified.
Think of the pack as a point mass connected by a rigid rod to the fulcrum (the pack edge pressing against the block of wood). When the rod passes the vertical, the pack starts to turn over. At that point, where is the normal force? Where is the centre of gravity?

AM
 
In the exact situation when the pack begins to turn over I can see those forces

gravity applied in the center of gravity
horizontal normal force(x) applied in the corner near the piece of wood
vertical normal force(y) applied in the corner near the piece of wood too.

but the point is why the net normal force , that's to say, normal force(x)+normal force(y)=black arrow must go through cg(center of gravity). What is the rule,law or whatever in order to infer that?

In the situation you describe it's quite difficult for me to see the forces.I suppose that the normal force is near the fulcrum and vertical as well as the centre of gravity but I'm not sure.

Andrew Mason said:
Think of the pack as a point mass connected by a rigid rod to the fulcrum (the pack edge pressing against the block of wood). When the rod passes the vertical, the pack starts to turn over. At that point, where is the normal force? Where is the centre of gravity?

AM
 
Ok,now I know the answer.The point is incredibly the "equivalence principle" and the stability of an object. That seems crazy but just think of it. The horizontal aceleration of the truck(plus the gravity downward) is the same than a situation where the truck is inclined in such a way that the resulting force goes through the rear botton edge of the pack, that is to say the fulcrum(in this situation the pack is about to tip over) So that's why the resulting normal force is equivalent to a force going through the center of gravity, because of the equivalence principle,isn't it marvelous?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top