Problem in inertial reference frame

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the mechanics of a pack on a frictionless truck bed and the conditions required for the pack to tip over. The key question involves why the normal force at the tipping point must pass through the center of gravity of the pack. It is clarified that this relationship is explained by the equivalence principle, which equates the horizontal acceleration of the truck with gravitational effects, leading to a scenario where the resultant force aligns with the center of gravity. The conversation highlights the complexity of visualizing forces in inertial frames and the importance of stability in determining tipping conditions. Ultimately, the connection between normal force and center of gravity is rooted in fundamental physics principles.
balest
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Well, in principle, this problem seems very easy but I don't know the exact explanation.Here we go. We have a truck and a pack in its back.The bed of the truck is frictionless and the pack is stopped by a small piece of wood of something like that. The size of the pack is whatever(for instance,base=2m^2, height=1,75m)and its mass is 2kg so the question is what is the minimum acceleration of the truck to turn over the pack. In the frame of the truck is easy for me to solve the problem but I don't know how to solve it in an inertial frame. What I want to know is why the normal force, in the exact moment when the pack begins to turn over, has to pass through the centre of gravity.Why? I'm mystified.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
balest said:
Well, in principle, this problem seems very easy but I don't know the exact explanation.Here we go. We have a truck and a pack in its back.The bed of the truck is frictionless and the pack is stopped by a small piece of wood of something like that. The size of the pack is whatever(for instance,base=2m^2, height=1,75m)and its mass is 2kg so the question is what is the minimum acceleration of the truck to turn over the pack. In the frame of the truck is easy for me to solve the problem but I don't know how to solve it in an inertial frame. What I want to know is why the normal force, in the exact moment when the pack begins to turn over, has to pass through the centre of gravity.Why? I'm mystified.
Think of the pack as a point mass connected by a rigid rod to the fulcrum (the pack edge pressing against the block of wood). When the rod passes the vertical, the pack starts to turn over. At that point, where is the normal force? Where is the centre of gravity?

AM
 
In the exact situation when the pack begins to turn over I can see those forces

gravity applied in the center of gravity
horizontal normal force(x) applied in the corner near the piece of wood
vertical normal force(y) applied in the corner near the piece of wood too.

but the point is why the net normal force , that's to say, normal force(x)+normal force(y)=black arrow must go through cg(center of gravity). What is the rule,law or whatever in order to infer that?

In the situation you describe it's quite difficult for me to see the forces.I suppose that the normal force is near the fulcrum and vertical as well as the centre of gravity but I'm not sure.

Andrew Mason said:
Think of the pack as a point mass connected by a rigid rod to the fulcrum (the pack edge pressing against the block of wood). When the rod passes the vertical, the pack starts to turn over. At that point, where is the normal force? Where is the centre of gravity?

AM
 
Ok,now I know the answer.The point is incredibly the "equivalence principle" and the stability of an object. That seems crazy but just think of it. The horizontal aceleration of the truck(plus the gravity downward) is the same than a situation where the truck is inclined in such a way that the resulting force goes through the rear botton edge of the pack, that is to say the fulcrum(in this situation the pack is about to tip over) So that's why the resulting normal force is equivalent to a force going through the center of gravity, because of the equivalence principle,isn't it marvelous?
 
I built a device designed to brake angular velocity which seems to work based on below, i used a flexible shaft that could bow up and down so i could visually see what was happening for the prototypes. If you spin two wheels in opposite directions each with a magnitude of angular momentum L on a rigid shaft (equal magnitude opposite directions), then rotate the shaft at 90 degrees to the momentum vectors at constant angular velocity omega, then the resulting torques oppose each other...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K