Problem involving two Ice Skaters' Positions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cocagola
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ice
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two ice skaters pushing apart on a frictionless surface, where one skater has significantly more mass than the other. The key point is the application of conservation of momentum, leading to the relationship between their velocities and the distances they travel. The lighter skater's distance from the original position can be expressed as d(M/(M+m)), where d is the total distance apart. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the ratio of their velocities to simplify the problem. The conversation highlights how recognizing these ratios can clarify the solution process.
Cocagola
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two skaters on a frictionless pond push apart from one another. One skater has mass M much greater than the mass m of the second skater. After some time the two skaters are a distance d apart. How far has the lighter moved from original position.

The answer is somehow d((M)/(M+m))

Homework Equations



conservation of momentum, delta x = v*time

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand the two skaters have equal but opposite momentum after they push each other.

so M*v1 = m*v2

and the position of is given by x2 = v2*t = M/m*v1

d = x2 - x1

... whenever I try to substitute for v2*t, I get an answer of d... I just can't seem to get the solution they get...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF

You can use the conservation of momentum to find the RATIO of the velocity of the heavier skater to the velocity of the lighter skater. The former will be moving more slowly than the latter by this ratio. Therefore, in the same amount of time, the distances traveled by each skater will also be related by this ratio.

You also know that the sum of these two distances has to add up to d, which means that you have two equations in two unknowns and can solve.
 
Thank you so much! Ratios make everything easier. I was getting bogged down by too many unknowns. I am glad I joined PF.
 
Cocagola said:
Thank you so much! Ratios make everything easier.

Umm, well that's basically what you were doing in your attempt anyway (you even wrote that v2 = M/m*v1, so you had the ratio, you just didn't add it to your post until after I had already replied). So I don't think I told you anything new, but if I somehow helped, then I am glad.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top