Problem of inter continental ballistic missiles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rohin.T.Narayan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ballistic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the kinematics of launching an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) from one point on Earth to another, addressing the challenges posed by the rotating "g" vector and the need for a suitable coordinate system. Lagrangian mechanics is suggested as a method to solve the problem, with the Lagrangian defined as the difference between kinetic and potential energy in an Earth-centered inertial frame. The use of Lagrange's equations is recommended to derive the equations of motion for the missile. The conversation also touches on the complexity of adding elements like gyroscopes to the system. Overall, the topic emphasizes the application of advanced mechanics in understanding missile trajectories.
Rohin.T.Narayan
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello guys I have a problem with projectile motion. Suppose we launch an Inter Continental Ballistic Missile from one point to another on Earth's surface ( For example from Tokyo to California ) how do we describe the kinematics of the missile.[ The problem is that the "g" vector is rotating and also we cannot choose a linear co-ordinate system. Any ideas ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would suggest using Lagrangian mechanics to solve the problem. Basically you chose a convenient coordinate system (lattitude, longitude, and height? or perhaps Euler angles?), and then you write the Lagrangian in that coordinate system as a function of your chosing variables, and their time derivatives.

For this simple problem, the Lagrangian L of the missile will be the kinetic energy T in an earth-centered inertial frame minus the potential enregy V in an ECI frame.

Then you use Lagrange's equations to get the equations of motion for the missile.

There's an overview at the Wikipedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_mechanics

it may not be clear enough if you are not familiar with the subject. You may have to consult a textbook if you want a really detailed explanation. The quick overview is that you have a function L, called the Lagrangian which is written in the form

L(x, x', t), where x is is a coordinate, x' is it's time derivative, and t is time.

Then Lagrange's equations give you the equations of motion directly from the Lagrangian

<br /> \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial x&#039;}\right) =\frac{\partial L}{\partial x}<br />

A simple example - in cartesian coordinates in a potential V with only one coordinate x

L(x,x') = .5*m*x'^2 - V(x)

(note that this is kinetic energy minus potential energy).

Then

d/dt(m*x') = -\partial V/\partial x

For systems with more than one coordinate, there is one Lagrange's equation for each independent coordiante (variable).
 
This problem is discussed in many textbooks, and is basic to the study of ballistics. Standard stuff. You want really hard; add a gyroscope to the system and then work out the dynamics of the combined system.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 
Would this be an application in Differential Geometry?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top