Quantum Computing and Entanglement

Chen
Messages
976
Reaction score
1
This is probably not the best site to get scientific information from, but still:
http://computer.howstuffworks.com/quantum-computer1.htm
Quantum computers also utilize another aspect of quantum mechanics known as entanglement. One problem with the idea of quantum computers is that if you try to look at the subatomic particles, you could bump them, and thereby change their value. But in quantum physics, if you apply an outside force to two atoms, it can cause them to become entangled, and the second atom can take on the properties of the first atom. So if left alone, an atom will spin in all directions; but the instant it is disturbed it chooses one spin, or one value; and at the same time, the second entangled atom will choose an opposite spin, or value. This allows scientists to know the value of the qubits without actually looking at them, which would collapse them back into 1's or 0's.
I don't understand the final bit - how does entanglement allow scientists to know the value of the qubits? I can understand how it could allow them to perform complicated calculations without measuring the qubits, so they can remain in superposition throughout the operation. But how can they know the value of them through entanglement?

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the article is referring to quantum error correction, which does use highly entangled states. It is not strictly correct to say that:

This allows scientists to know the value of the qubits without actually looking at them, which would collapse them back into 1's or 0's.

Instead, quantum information is encoded in a subspace of the whole Hilbert space, so that the states |0> and |1> are actually encoded in highly entangled states. A simple example of this is the 9-qubit code found by Shor, in which

|0> -> (|000> + |111>)(|000> + |111>)(|000> + |111>)
|1> -> (|000> - |111>)(|000> - |111>)(|000> - |111>)

The encoding of a general state a|0> + b|1> is such that if anyone of the nine qubits suffer a bit flip error (|0> -> |1>, |1> -> |0>) or a phase flip error
(|0> -> |0>, |1> -> -|1>) or a combination of the two, then the error can be corrected by making measurements on the encoded state that reveal the error without telling you anything about the state. Thus, the error can be corrected without collapsing the superposition.

It can be shown that this is sufficient to correct a much more general class of errors than just bit flips and phase flips.
 
it's always good to be cautious when getting scientific information from non-scientific sources.

You are correct in your understanding that entanglement allows for quantum computers to perform calculations without measuring the qubits and collapsing them. However, entanglement also allows for the transfer of information between the entangled particles. This means that by manipulating one of the entangled particles, scientists can indirectly observe the state of the other particle without directly measuring it. This allows them to know the value of the qubits without collapsing them into definite 1's or 0's. It's a bit of a complex concept to fully grasp, but essentially entanglement allows for a form of communication between the particles, allowing for indirect observation and measurement.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top