What is \mathbb{C}(x) and why is it not algebraically closed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter logarithmic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    closure
logarithmic
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
Why is it that \mathbb{C}(x) (\mathbb{C} adjoined with x) is not algebraically closed? Here x is an indeterminate.

My first question is what does the field extension \mathbb{C}(x) even mean? If E is a field extension of F, and a is an transcendental element of E over F, then the notation \mathbb{C}(a) is defined to mean the field of quotients of \mathbb{C}[a] (set of polynomials with complex coefficients). If a is algebraic then \mathbb{C}(a) is defined to be \mathbb{C}[a] (which is the same thing as the field of quotients of \mathbb{C}[a], since in this case \mathbb{C}[a] is a field).

Now x is an indeterminate, is that the algebraic or transcendental case? i.e. does \mathbb{C}(x) mean field of quotients of polynomials with complex coefficients, or does it mean just polynomials with complex coefficients.

So apparently \mathbb{C}(x) is somehow not algebraically closed. So is there a complex polynomial whose root isn't a complex number? Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\mathbb{C}(x) has to be field of quotients, because it has to be a field.

It's not a complex polynomial. It's a polynomial with coefficients in \mathbb{C}(x). (note these will NOT be polynomials in x). For example:

p(y)=x^4y^2 + (3x^2-\frac{2}{x})y + \frac{3}{x}

is a quadratic polynomial. The question is whether you can find a solution y \in \mathbb{C}(x)
 
So the notation \mathbb{C}(x) isn't related to the notation \mathbb{C}(a), where a is algebraic or transcendental?

Hmm I thought field of quotients meant something in the form p(x)/q(x) i.e. has elements like:
\frac{2ix^2 -3}{4i-x}.
So this isn't right either?

Also, while on the subject of field extensions, why is it that: if E is a field extension of F, and a in E is algebraic over F, if b in F(a) then F(b) is a subfield of F(a).
 
Last edited:
What do you have for your definition for F(a) if F is a field?
 
Office_Shredder said:
What do you have for your definition for F(a) if F is a field?

If F is a field, then F[a] would be the set of all polynomials in a, (i.e. a typical element would be b_n * a^n + ... + b_1 * a + b_0 where all the b_ i in F), then F(a) is defined to be the field of quotients of F[a].
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top