Problem on calculating decay rates/lifetimes

  • Thread starter Thread starter AuraCrystal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay
AuraCrystal
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given the Lagrangian

\mathcal{L}=\frac{1}{2} ( \partial_{\mu} \Phi)^2-\frac{1}{2}M^2 \Phi ^2 + \frac{1}{2} ( \partial_{\mu} \phi)^2-\frac{1}{2}M^2 \phi ^2-\mu \Phi \phi \phi,

[The last term, the interaction term allows a \Phi particle to decay into 2 \phi particles, assuming of course that M>2m.] Calculate the decay rate of that process to lowest order in \mu

Homework Equations



Dyson expansion, etc.

The Attempt at a Solution


OK, so I'm stuck on computing the transition amplitude here. Following Aitchison and Hey, the transition amplitude is (letting the initial momentum be pi and the final momenta be p1 and p2):

<f|S|i>=<p_1, p_2|S|p_i>

To the lowest order in \mu, the S-matrix is

S=-i\mu \int d^4 x \mathcal{H}_{interaction}=-i\mu \int d^4 x \Phi \phi \phi

so to lowest order, the transition amplitude is

<p_1, p_2|S|p_i>=-i\mu<0|a_{\phi}(p_1) a_{\phi}(p_2) \sqrt(2E_1) \sqrt(2E_2) \int d^4 x \Phi \phi \phi \sqrt(2E_i) a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) |0>
Considering just the last bit, namely
\phi \phi \sqrt(2E_i) a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) |0>
We can expand the \phi in terms of creation and annihilation operators, right? For the annihilation operator, it'll commute with the a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) so that term will give 0. For the other\phi, we get the same thing. So you're going to get something like

\int a_{\phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) a_{\phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) |0>

Can't you just commute a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) to the left? When bracketed with the final state which has no \Phi particles, this'll give 0. Did I make a mistake? Or do I just have to consider a higher order term in the Dyson expansion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AuraCrystal said:
Can't you just commute a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) to the left? When bracketed with the final state which has no \Phi particles, this'll give 0. Did I make a mistake? Or do I just have to consider a higher order term in the Dyson expansion?

When moving a_{\Phi}^{\dagger}(p_i) to the left, wouldn't you need to consider what happens when moving it past \Phi?
 
^Yeah, I forgot about that! Thanks! :)
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top