Problem regarding conservation of momentum in different systems

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a bullet embedding into a block on an incline and the application of conservation laws. Participants debate the relevance of conservation of momentum and energy in solving the problem, noting that momentum conservation applies immediately after the collision while energy conservation is used afterward. The bullet's initial kinetic energy is converted into gravitational potential energy as the system moves up the incline. Some contributors emphasize the importance of recognizing that the collision is inelastic, which complicates the use of energy conservation throughout the entire process. Ultimately, the consensus is that both conservation of momentum and energy are necessary to accurately analyze the scenario.
ParrotPete
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A bullet of mass m_{1} with initial horizontal speed v_{0} hits a wooden block of mass m_{2} initially at rest on an incline of angle β and embeds itself into the wooden block, how far up the incline will the bullet and block travel?

Homework Equations



\bar{P}_{initial} = \bar{P}_{final}

U = ΔT+ΔV_{g}+ΔV_{e}

The Attempt at a Solution



\bar{P}_{initial} = m_{1}*v_{1}*\bar{e}_{i}
\bar{P}_{final} = (m_{1}+m_{2})v_{2}*(cos(β)\bar{e}_{i}+sin(β)*\bar{e}_{j})
v_{2}*sin(β) = 0 v_{2}*cos(β) = m_{1}*v_{1}/(m_{1}+m_{2}) ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you think conservation of momentum is relevant in this problem?
 
voko said:
What makes you think conservation of momentum is relevant in this problem?

Because the bullet embeds itself in the block of wood.
 
But then it travels along an incline, exchanging its momentum with the surroundings. It stops in the end, which means the momentum of the block and the bullet is zero. I cannot see how you could use conservation of momentum here.
 
voko said:
But then it travels along an incline, exchanging its momentum with the surroundings. It stops in the end, which means the momentum of the block and the bullet is zero. I cannot see how you could use conservation of momentum here.

First the entire system has kinetic energy (m_1+m_2)*v_final^2/2 This is then converted to gravitational potential energy.
 
@voko

You can use conservation of momentum between the bullet (horizonal motion) and the block instananeously after the collision, then it switches to conservation of energy.
 
ParrotPete said:
First the entire system has kinetic energy (m_1+m_2)*v_final^2/2 This is then converted to gravitational potential energy.

Well, it could be easier to note that initially only the bullet has non-zero kinetic energy. Then the bullet and the block end up having some potential energy. This way you don't have to figure out the velocity of the system after the impact.

EDIT: this is incorrect. See below.
 
Last edited:
jfy4 said:
@voko

You can use conservation of momentum between the bullet (horizonal motion) and the block instananeously after the collision, then it switches to conservation of energy.

This is true. But that is not enough to solve the problem. And because it can be avoided, as I just remarked above, one should apply Occam's razor.

EDIT: this is incorrect. See below.
 
Last edited:
the collision isn't eleastic, can you use conservation of energy from start to finish?
 
  • #10
Yes, you are quite right. One has to apply conservation of momentum to find out the velocity of the system after the impact, because the impact is not elastic.
 
Back
Top