Problem with a electric circuit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to an electric circuit, specifically focusing on the simplification of impedances and the use of formulas in calculations. Participants share their insights and suggestions regarding the approach to solving the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims to have solved the problem but does not provide details.
  • Another participant suggests simplifying impedances and emphasizes the importance of using brackets in calculations to ensure proper procedure.
  • A different participant expresses uncertainty about further simplification, noting that their textbook examples do not require it and seeks additional ideas.
  • One participant, with a background in Electrical studies, asks for clarification on a specific symbol, indicating a potential gap in understanding the circuit components.
  • A participant requests the original question to better understand the context of the discussion and the suggestions provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus, as there are differing opinions on the necessity of simplifying the circuit and the clarity of the original question.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of clarity regarding the original problem statement, which may affect the discussion. Additionally, assumptions about the level of simplification required and the interpretation of circuit symbols remain unresolved.

hard_worker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Problem-solved

I have solved the problem
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Just taking a quick browse, I have to get back to work, but first things first, try simplifying your impedances first. I always work in simplified equivalents. I also noticed your above formula is missing a lot of brackets, use this to force proper procedure out of your calculator. It does not follow BEDMAS, so you have to tell it to ;)

Suer
 
The problem is that I don't think I should simplify more, the examples in my book use this level of information, therefore I don't know how to simplify it. Anyway I'm grateful for any ideas

When it comes to the parantheses: h21 h11 etc are one part eg. there is no h*21 so there shouldn't be any problems getting this through a calculator as intended.

Olav
 
Last edited:
I studied Electrical, not Electronics, but I'll give it a whirl.
What symbol is that, a Galvanometer? The one with the arrow inside the circle?

Suer
 
Any chance you could repost your original question?? (I see you edited your initial post so that we no longer see the question)..
I (and believe many others) am curious what question was asked and find it interesting reading the suggestions made to help you find a solution...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
2K