Problem with Laplace transform unit step function questions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Laplace transform to functions involving the unit step function, specifically focusing on the expression L{2t u(t-1)}. Participants are exploring the implications of the unit step function and its role in shifting functions within the context of Laplace transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition and behavior of the unit step function, u(t-a), and its effect on functions. There are attempts to clarify the transformation process and the implications of shifting in the context of Laplace transforms. Some participants express confusion regarding the application of these concepts in their attempts.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct application of the Laplace transform to the given function. Some participants have offered insights into the transformation process, while others are seeking further clarification and examples to solidify their understanding. Multiple interpretations of the problem and its components are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the need for references or examples to better understand the unit step function and its applications in Laplace transforms. There is also a recognition of the potential confusion arising from the shifting nature of the unit step function in relation to the Laplace transform.

enger
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



L{2t u(t-1)}


Homework Equations



L{g(t) u(t-c)} = e^-cs L{g(t+c)}

The Attempt at a Solution



L{2t u(t-1)}=e^-s L{2(t+1)}
L{2(t+1)}=2/s^2+2/s
L{2t u(t-1)} = e^-s {2/s^2 + 2/s}


i think the whole attempt is wrong , I'm getting confused in this type of questions , i would appreciate if someone could explain the u(t-a) function & solve this problem...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I dunno, looks like you have it right to me.
 
By step unit function, I assume you mean that the function that is 1 on the interval [a,b] and 0 elsewhere? Just write down the definition:

<br /> \int_{0}^{\infty}\chi_{[a,b]}(x)e^{-sx}dx=\int_{a}^{b}e^{-sx}dx<br />

I presume you can do the rest from here.
 
Char. Limit said:
I dunno, looks like you have it right to me.

Looks right to me too. What is PF SAS?
 
LCKurtz said:
Looks right to me too. What is PF SAS?

Oh, not much. Just a small group of people, unrelated to PF, dedicated to fighting crackpots who appear on this site. Like the .9999... does not equal 1 people.
 
What does the acronym SAS stand for? And if you really want to engage the crackpots, visit usenet's sci.math. But, of course, a real crank is immune to correction.
 
Special Anti-crackpot Service. The name is modeled after the British SAS.
 
enger said:
i think the whole attempt is wrong , I'm getting confused in this type of questions , i would appreciate if someone could explain the u(t-a) function & solve this problem...
The unit step function u(t) is 0 if t<0 and 1 if t≥0. That's it.

If you have u(t-a), it's 0 if t<a and 1 if t≥a.

Now consider g(t)u(t-a). When t<a, g(t)u(t-a)=g(t)×0=0. When t≥a, g(t)u(t-a)=g(t)×1=g(t). So g(t)u(t-a) is just a convenient way of writing

g(t)u(t-a) = \left\{ \begin{array}{cr}0 &amp; t&lt;a \\ g(t) &amp; t\ge a\end{array}\right.
 
is there a good reference with examples , i need to understand this part a little more.

the (t-a) is the shift , so i shouldn't be expanding it in the problem i solved above !
 
  • #10
I have no idea what you're asking. Could you elaborate?
 
  • #11
vela said:
I have no idea what you're asking. Could you elaborate?

in this step

L{2(t+1)}=2/s^2+2/s

i expanded the equation to (2t+2) then used Laplace transform for t^n & constant , is this right or wrong , since i understand that U(t-1) is the shift of the equation
 
  • #12
Yes, it is. The shift isn't involved in that step. You're finding the Laplace transform of an unshifted 2(t+1). When you combine that with the exponential factor, you get the transform of the truncated 2t.

Another way you can do the problem is to use t=t-1+1 to write

2t u(t-1) = 2 [(t-1)+1] u(t-1)

Now everything is in terms of t-1, so you should be able to see it's just the function 2(t+1)u(t) shifted to the right by 1. That's why you calculate the Laplace transform of 2(t+1), unshifted, and then slap the exponential factor on, which indicates the shift.
 
  • #13
vela said:
Yes, it is. The shift isn't involved in that step. You're finding the Laplace transform of an unshifted 2(t+1). When you combine that with the exponential factor, you get the transform of the truncated 2t.

Another way you can do the problem is to use t=t-1+1 to write

2t u(t-1) = 2 [(t-1)+1] u(t-1)

Now everything is in terms of t-1, so you should be able to see it's just the function 2(t+1)u(t) shifted to the right by 1. That's why you calculate the Laplace transform of 2(t+1), unshifted, and then slap the exponential factor on, which indicates the shift.

so the answer i added for the problem is right?

also is there a reference with examples?

i get confused when solving problems like l{u(t-pi)sin2t)
 
  • #14
Yes, as the others noted, your answer is correct.

I don't know of any references offhand. Electrical engineering textbooks on linear system analysis probably cover this material.

If it helps, just write everything out step by step. For u(t-pi) sin 2t, you have g(t)=sin 2t and c=pi. So g(t+c) = g(t+pi) = sin 2(t+pi) = ... and so on.

Or use the trick where you say t=(t-pi)+pi. So sin 2t = sin [2(t-pi)+2pi] = ...
 
  • #15
enger said:
so the answer i added for the problem is right?

also is there a reference with examples?

i get confused when solving problems like l{u(t-pi)sin2t)

Maybe you just need to think about the proof for arbitrary f(t):

L(f(t)u(t-a)) = \int_0^\infty e^{-st}f(t)u(t-a)\, dt = \int_a^\infty e^{-st}f(t)\cdot 1\, dt

Now let w = t-a, dw = dt

= \int_0^\infty e^{-s(w+a)}f(w+a)\, dw = e^{-as}\int_0^\infty e^{-sw}f(w+a)\, dw= e^{-as}\int_0^\infty e^{-st}f(t+a)\, dt=e^{-as}L(f(t+a))
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K