Problem with perfectly inelastic collisions.

AI Thread Summary
In a perfectly inelastic collision, momentum is conserved while kinetic energy is not, which can lead to confusion. When two trucks collide, one being twice as heavy, they can still move together post-collision despite losing kinetic energy. The resulting velocity after the collision depends on their initial speeds, and if they are moving at the same speed, they will move together at one-third of that speed. The key takeaway is that inelastic collisions do not imply a complete loss of kinetic energy, but rather a redistribution of it. Understanding this distinction clarifies how momentum conservation operates in such scenarios.
Cherryboba
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Two trucks, one twice as heavy as the other, collide head on (assume it's one dimensional and easy ;) ) and the collission is perfectly inelastic. If it was perfectly inelastic there would be no kinetic energy left, and therefore no velocity. How do the trucks manage to conserve momentum by moving in the direction of the smaller truck if they have no energy?

Please help out, I've been searching for days.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An inelastic collision isn't necessarily one in which all of the kinetic energy is lost. Its simply one in which the kinetic energy isn't necessarily conserved.

Inelastic collisions are determined by conservation of momentum alone. In your example, if both trucks are going at the same speed, they would have a resulting velocity (one third of the initial).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top