Problem with Rotational Inertia

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rotational inertia of a disc with a cut-out hole, focusing on the application of the parallel axis theorem. The user struggles with determining the moment of inertia about the center of mass, especially given that the center of mass is offset from the disc's center. A method is suggested that involves calculating the inertia of the full disc and subtracting the inertia of the missing part, avoiding the need to find the center of mass directly. Additionally, the conversation touches on the dynamics of the disc when rolling and oscillating, clarifying that it behaves like a physical pendulum due to the lack of a fixed rotation point. The final goal is to derive the period of small oscillations based on the established moment of inertia.
Lancen
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am having problem with a relatively simple problem that I probably have done before but because my Physics have become so rusty recently I just can't get the right answer. You have a disc that sitting about some point P on the ground - so its upright - and there is a hole cut out on the top of the disc so that the top of the hole touches the top of the disc. The hole has a radius of a/2 and the disc and radius of a. The center of mass of the disc c is a/6 from the center of the disc. And the disc has a uniform mass density of v. What is the rotational inertia of the disc about the point P that it touches on the ground?

So parallel axis theorem right? Ip = Icm + ML^2. My problem is what is Icm? 1/2M*L^2 by any means. But what is L? Usually if the disc' center of mass is about its center then its just the radius but here the center of mass is a/6 from the center of the disc.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: If the disk were solid, you could find its moment of inertia. By definition the moment of inertia is a sum of the products (dm)r^2 where dm is the mass of a tiny piece of the disk. Since it is just a sum, you could divide the disk up any way you found convenient and find the moments of inertia of each piece and add them together. Think of a solid disk as being made up of two parts. One part is the thing you have, and the second part is the disk that was cut away. The total angular momentum of a solid disk is the sum of those two parts.
 
I got that far. I know the cut out hole is presented as "negative" mass, but the problem is Ip = Icm + M*h^2 = M*L^2+M*h^2=1/2((pi*a^2*v)-pi*(a/2)^2*v))*L^2+((pi*a^2*v)-pi*(a/2)^2*v)*(5a/6)^2.

Here Icm is the rotational inertia about the center of mass C which is not at the center of the circle, and h is the distance from the Center of mass to the point at which the circle touches the ground P. My problem is what's L?
 
Lancen said:
I got that far. I know the cut out hole is presented as "negative" mass, but the problem is Ip = Icm + M*h^2 = M*L^2+M*h^2=1/2((pi*a^2*v)-pi*(a/2)^2*v))*L^2+((pi*a^2*v)-pi*(a/2)^2*v)*(5a/6)^2.

Here Icm is the rotational inertia about the center of mass C which is not at the center of the circle, and h is the distance from the Center of mass to the point at which the circle touches the ground P. My problem is what's L?
There are a couple of ways to approach this. Here is a calculation based on the "full" disk about point P minus the "missing" disk about point P. It does not require you to find the CM of the object or an L related to that CM. It can be done that way, but it involves more steps. This way uses separate Ls for the full disk and the missing disk.

I_{FCM} = \frac{1}{2}Ma^2

I_{FP} = \frac{1}{2}Ma^2 + Ma^2 = \frac{3}{2}Ma^2

I_{MCM} = \frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{M}{4}} \right)\left( {\frac{a}{2}} \right)^2 = \frac{1}{{32}}Ma^2

I_{MP} = \frac{1}{{32}}Ma^2 + \frac{M}{4}\left( {\frac{{3a}}{2}} \right)^2 = \frac{1}{{32}}Ma^2 + \frac{9}{{16}}Ma^2 = \frac{{19}}{{32}}Ma^2

I_{NP} = I_{FP} - I_{MP} = \frac{3}{2}Ma^2 - \frac{{19}}{{32}}Ma^2 = \left( {\frac{{48}}{{32}} - \frac{{19}}{{32}}} \right)Ma^2 = \left( {\frac{{29}}{{32}}} \right)Ma^2
 
Last edited:
Ah, I see. I have one more problem with the question. If the disc is upright and is free to roll without slipping along the surface on which it rests under gravitational forces, what's the period T for small oscillations about the vertical position? I am having a bit of trouble understanding the problem. Is it saying that under some condition instead of rolling forward it will just rock back and forth about an imaginary line down the middle? And is this a simple or physical pendulum? Physical I think because it is represented as a rigid body. Do I just go straight ahead and try to solve for T=2*pi/w, where w=sqrt(mgh/I)? Where w is the angular velocity and I is the moment of inertia, and solve this using the moment of inertia that was just solved for?
 
Lancen said:
Ah, I see. I have one more problem with the question. If the disc is upright and is free to roll without slipping along the surface on which it rests under gravitational forces, what's the period T for small oscillations about the vertical position? I am having a bit of trouble understanding the problem. Is it saying that under some condition instead of rolling forward it will just rock back and forth about an imaginary line down the middle? And is this a simple or physical pendulum? Physical I think because it is represented as a rigid body. Do I just go straight ahead and try to solve for T=2*pi/w, where w=sqrt(mgh/I)? Where w is the angular velocity and I is the moment of inertia, and solve this using the moment of inertia that was just solved for?
Now you tell me :rolleyes: I avoided calculating the CM in the I calculation, but now we need it. You had quoted it earlier as a/6 below the center of the big disk, and that is correct. Any displacement of the disk from point P being in contact with the floor will raise the CM, so there will be a restorative force that will bring it back to equilibrium. It's not quite a physical pendulum because there is no fixed point of rotation. Still, if we can show that for small oscillations the potential energy is a quadratic function of diplacement, then we will have shown the motion to be harmonic and we can find the period. See if you can write an expression for the potential energy in terms of the angle of the roll from equilibrium. The potential energy can be taken as zero at equilibrium and Mgh(θ) elsewhere; h(θ) is the height of the CM relative to the lowest point.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top