Problem with Understanding Ampere's Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr-R
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ampere's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of Ampere's Law and the confusion stemming from its use in different geometrical contexts. The user initially applies the law to a potato-shaped loop and derives the equation correctly, but struggles when attempting to apply the same method to a circular loop. They mistakenly use the magnetic field formula for a straight wire instead of the correct formula for a circular loop, leading to an incorrect result. Clarification is sought on why the same approach yields different answers for different shapes. The user ultimately resolves their confusion and requests to close the discussion.
Mr-R
Messages
123
Reaction score
23
Dear all,

I am trying use Ampere's law and came across a problem which is a result of my lack of understanding.

\oint B.dl=uI
My lecturer derived the above equation by defining a point in the middle of a potato shaped loop. Where he stated that dl in this case is just rdθ. (r is the line joining dl to the point defined in the middle). And using B=\frac{uI}{2πr} he integrated it with respect to rdθ from θ=0 to 2π to get \oint B.dl=uI.

Now, I am trying to do the same for a circular loop. Obviously I got the same answer uI. But its wrong as it should be \frac{uI}{2r}. The problem is that I am using the same approch he used for the general shape but not getting the same answer. I am using B=\frac{uI}{2πr} where I should actually use B=\frac{uI}{4πr^{2}}

Could someone explain why can't I do that?

P.s sorry if this is messy. It is my first time.
Rashid
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I got it guys. Mods can close this.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top