Problems Integrating an Infinite Series From E&M

JKreutz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, guys. For an E&M/quantum mechanics problem I have to integrate the series below:

Homework Statement



Integrate

\int{r^{2}e^{y r} \, dr}.2. The attempt at a solution

Using integration by parts and and "differentiating under the integral" give the same answer:

I= \frac{2 e^{yr}}{y^{3}}-\frac{2 r e^{yr}}{y^{2}}+\frac{r^{2} e^{yr}}{y} + C,

where I is the solution to the integral and C is an arbitrary constant. I'd read about Newton trying to integrate infinite series, so I thought as a check and out of curiosity I'd express the integrand as an infinite series and integrate each term. Specifically I expressed exp(yr) as a Maclauren series, multiplied each term by the r^{2} and used the "power rule" to get

I=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} {\frac{y^{n} r^{(n+2)}}{n! \, (n+3)}}.

I can't see how this series could represent the other answer I found. Moreover, I've never seen this done before and I don't know to look up this kind of information. (Googling "Infinite Series and Integrals" was not helpful ><). Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I wonder if you did it right, if you set r=0 then you should get the answer y^-3, but looking at the series, I don't think you do.
 
JKreutz said:
Specifically I expressed exp(yr) as a Maclauren series, multiplied each term by the r^{2} and used the "power rule" to get

I=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} {\frac{y^{n} r^{(n+2)}}{n! \, (n+3)}}.

There is a mistake, the power of r has to be n+3. And you need to add a constant to the power series integral, too. Replace exp(yr) in the first integral by its power series. Supposed you are in the range of convergence, the power-series solution is equivalent to the first integral if you match the constants. Find the coefficients of r, r2, r3 and so on and compare them.

ehild
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top