Problems regarding group presentations and submodules

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jösus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Jösus
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi! I'm studying for an exam in group- and ring theory, and I have some questions about two problems that I have not managed to solve. I would greatly appreciate help.

Problem 1. Determine the order of the group G with the presentation (a,b \big\vert\: a^{6} = 1, b^{2} = a^{3}, ba = a^{-1}b).

For the first problem, the relation ba = a^{-1}b enables us to conclude that the order of G is less than- or equal to 24 (we can collect all the a's to the left, and the largest possible orders for a and b are 6 and 4, respectively. Moreover, using the relation b^{2} = a^{3} we can write all elements as a^{k}b^{j} as k lies in the range 0 to 5, and j is either 0 or 1. This shows that the group has order less than or equal to 12. Also, the group has order \geq 6, simply since we can construct a group of that order satisfying the relations (assume a is of order 3). My problem is that I cannot find clear arguments for why the group should have order 12, which I believe. Could I in some nice way just prove that for the collection of symbols a^{k}b^{j} above, the group axioms hold? Does there perhaps exist a theorem concerning presentations of this type? Problem 2. Let M be the \mathbb{C}[x]-module \mathbb{C}^{3} where \mathbb{C} acts naturally and x acts via x \cdot a = T \cdot a, for elements a \in \mathbb{C} and a given linear transformation T. How can one determine all submodules of M?For this problem less of an idea. I understand that the actions of \mathbb{C} and x induces an action of any complec polynomial, and the submodules are clearily the subspaces of \mathbb{C}^{3} stable under the linear map T. I guess some stable subspaces would be those spanned by eigenvectors for T. Are these all? I haven't thought a lot about this, but I'm running out of time, and would thus be very thankful for some help.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because the presentation is pretty nice, it's not too hard to show that you get a group by having elements of the form a^i b^j, i=0,...5, j=0,1 and specifying the multiplication rule. Alternatively, a semi-direct product of Z_3 and Z_4 has that presentation: http://shell.cas.usf.edu/~wclark/algctlg/small_groups.html
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
499
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top