Problems that are wrong that I must find errors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jkohn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Errors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding mathematical problems that contain errors for the purpose of identifying and correcting them. The user seeks challenging examples related to single variable calculus and classical mechanics, specifically proofs that are flawed, such as the "All horses are the same color" argument. There is a request for recommendations on resources or books that provide such erroneous problems. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the errors in these proofs to enhance learning. Overall, the user is looking for engaging ways to practice error detection in mathematical reasoning.
Jkohn
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Basically what I am trying to do is solve problems by finding errors in the run down of the problem.
An example would be one of those proofs that 1=2, debunking them. I want to find problems like that; a lot harder and more relevant to what I am learning. Would like it for single variable calculus and also for classical mechanics..
Any recommendations??
-cheers

**I am not sure if I posted in the correct place
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I just want to clarify things. What you want is problems in which we have found errors, and you want us to show you the problems for you to find these errors? I don't think this would yield a lot of results for you to work on. Or do you want us to give you just ANY problem and see if you can find an error in it?

What exactly are you asking here?
 
What I want are problems that are done with errors (purposely) so that I can find those errors and correct them. I am sure there is a book out there--have not found one.
 
Here is the "No horse of a different color" problem that occurs in many different guises.

An inductive proof that "All horses are the same color". Consider a set containing one horse. Obviously "all" horses in that set are of the same color. Assume that, for some number, k, any set of k horses must be of the same color. Let A be a set of k+1 horses. Call one the horses "a" and let B be the set of all horses in A except "a". There are now k horses in the set so they are all of the same color. Call one of the horses
"b" and let C be the set of all horses in A except "b". Again, C contains k horses and so all are of the same color. But "a" is in set C so all horses in C must be the same color as "a" and "b" is in set B so all horses in B must be the same color as "b". Since both "a" and "b" are the same color as any other horse in A they are the same color and so all horses in A are of the same color. Therefore, by induction, all the horses in any herd, of any size, must be the same color.

Where is the error in that argument?
 
If you like classical geometry here is a great book of false proofs:
The Mathematical Recreations of Lewis Carroll: Pillow Problems and a Tangled Tale (Dover Recreational Math)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top