Problems understanding the 2nd law of thermodynamics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the second law of thermodynamics, particularly in relation to energy degradation from high quality to low quality forms. Participants explore concepts related to heat engines, energy recycling, and the challenges of maintaining colder reservoirs for efficient energy use.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that high quality energy, such as coal or fuel, degrades into low quality energy, like heat in a cold reservoir, as per the second law of thermodynamics.
  • Another participant questions the feasibility of recycling heat entering the cold reservoir to maximize work output, proposing the idea of connecting an even cooler reservoir.
  • Concerns are raised about how to maintain the colder cold sink, with a participant noting that cooling it further would require a heat pump, which involves additional work and energy consumption.
  • It is argued that thermal energy cannot be recycled and always moves 'downhill' in terms of quality, necessitating the input of work to convert it back to a higher temperature.
  • A participant mentions cogeneration as an example of recovering heat for useful purposes, highlighting the challenges of converting mechanical energy back into heat.
  • Discussion includes practical experiences, such as the temperature of cooling water in a plant and the inefficiencies associated with chilling processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the possibility of recycling thermal energy and the implications of maintaining colder reservoirs. There is no consensus on the feasibility of these ideas, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of achieving a cold source that is not naturally cold, emphasizing that such processes require energy consumption and are less than 100% efficient.

Tony Hau
Messages
107
Reaction score
30
So my professor says that the implication of 2nd law of thermodynamics is that high quality energy will be degraded into low quality energy. By high quality energy he means something like coal or fuel. By low quality energy he means something like heat entering the cold resevoir in a heat engine. The logic is that u must need to pump some heat into the cold resevoir for a heat engine. But I am thinking why can't we recycle the heat entering the cold resevoir so that eventually all heat input can be used to give work done, for example by connecting a even cooler resevoir to it.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Tony Hau said:
for example by connecting a even cooler resevoir to it.
And. how do you propose to keep that colder cold sink cold? In the context of heat engines your cold sink temperature is the best you can obtain. Cooling it further would involve a heat pump and where woulds that get you? :wink:

We don't "recycle" thermal energy; it always goes 'downhill' when left to itself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
sophiecentaur said:
And. how do you propose to keep that colder cold sink cold? In the context of heat engines your cold sink temperature is the best you can obtain. Cooling it further would involve a heat pump and where woulds that get you? :wink:

We don't "recycle" thermal energy; it always goes 'downhill' when left to itself.
You must put in some work to convert it back to higher temperature. I think in this sense, you are burning more and more fuel for this conversion. So high grade energy must go to low grade energy.
 
Even if I supply a work into the heat pump so that the the amount of heat is pumped back into the hot resevoir, fuel is burnt eventually.
 
This is an example of "recovering" some heat for useful purposes:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogeneration

You can convert most of mechanical energy into heat, but the opposite is harder to achieve.
Therefore, achieving a cold source that is not naturally cold or cold enough, requires the consumption of energy and a process that is less that 100% efficient.
 
Tony Hau said:
for example by connecting a even cooler resevoir to it.
The cold reservoir is generally at environmental conditions. So for a terrestrial heat engine, something above 0C. I worked at a plant in Florida where the cooling water to the condenser would approach 35C in the summertime. When all the customers were running their air conditioners...

Lnewqban said:
Therefore, achieving a cold source that is not naturally cold or cold enough, requires the consumption of energy and a process that is less that 100% efficient.
Are you guys talking about chilling the condenser cooling water? While the chillers would be "less than 100% efficient" -- overall it's a negative, the plant output would go down not up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
11K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K