- #31
- 30,374
- 7,466
Yes - I've been there. But then, I look at what I spent the money on instead and it takes the pain away.Chronos said:
Processor power for entry level Astrophotography
- Context: Stargazing
- Thread starter sophiecentaur
- Start date
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the requirements for processor power and software options for entry-level astrophotography, particularly focusing on image processing capabilities. Participants share their experiences and seek advice on hardware specifications, software choices, and processing techniques.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Homework-related
Main Points Raised
- One participant notes the effectiveness of stacking images for noise reduction but expresses concerns about the limited software options available for OS X, suggesting a Windows laptop as an alternative.
- Another participant emphasizes the importance of RAM over processor speed for image processing, suggesting that an SSD may also be a higher priority than processor generation.
- Some participants mention APT (Astrophotography Tool) as a good, inexpensive software option for DSLR users, while others discuss the steep learning curve and cost of Nebulosity.
- One member shares their experience with a 3GHz i3 iMac and expresses doubts about improving their setup, while also noting the visible improvements in noise reduction when using Nebulosity.
- A suggestion is made to consider using Python and its image processing libraries as an alternative approach to astrophotography image processing.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express varying opinions on the importance of processor power versus RAM for image processing, and there is no consensus on the best software options, with multiple competing views on the effectiveness and usability of different programs.
Contextual Notes
Some participants highlight the limitations of their current hardware and software setups, and there are unresolved questions regarding optimal exposure times and the ideal number of images for astrophotography.
Who May Find This Useful
Individuals interested in entry-level astrophotography, particularly those looking for guidance on hardware specifications and software options for image processing.
- #32
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 11,420
- 750
I have spent tons of money on overkill for stuff entirely unsuited for my intended use, and saved a ton by resisting things that would have been equally unsuitable.The trick is in balancing your wishes with your budget.
- #33
- 30,374
- 7,466
It sits there, in the box, staring up accusingly at you and you quickly avert your eyes!Chronos said:
PS Your last two posts are contradictory - showing your / our ambivalence in these matters. You can't win.
- #34
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 11,420
- 750
Agreed, I confuse myself most of the time.