Is the Gradient of a Contravariant Vector a Covariant Vector?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nigelscott
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Vector
nigelscott
Messages
133
Reaction score
4
I have:

dVμ = (∂Vμ/∂xη)dxη where Vμ is a contravariant vector field

I believe the () term on the RHS is a covariant tensor. Is the dot product of () and dxη a scalar and how do I write this is compact form. I know how this works for scalars but am not clear when tensors are involved.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nigelscott said:
I have:

dVμ = (∂Vμ/∂xη)dxη where Vμ is a contravariant vector field

I believe the () term on the RHS is a covariant tensor. Is the dot product of () and dxη a scalar and how do I write this is compact form. I know how this works for scalars but am not clear when tensors are involved.

You haven't been very specific. What kind of space are you in? Is it flat or curved?

Generically speaking, ##\partial_\nu V^\mu## is not a tensor at all, because in curved space, partial derivatives do not transform nicely under changes of coordinates. Using a covariant derivative,

\nabla_\nu V^\mu
is a tensor of mixed type.

In curved space, "##\mathrm{d} V^\mu##" is not really a sensible thing to do, because it is not covariant under coordinate changes.
 
Flat space. I am trying to show that the gradient of a contravariant vector is a covariant vector. I understand how to show this for a scalar, but not sure how to extend this to vectors/tensors.
 
Hello! There is a simple line in the textbook. If ##S## is a manifold, an injectively immersed submanifold ##M## of ##S## is embedded if and only if ##M## is locally closed in ##S##. Recall the definition. M is locally closed if for each point ##x\in M## there open ##U\subset S## such that ##M\cap U## is closed in ##U##. Embedding to injective immesion is simple. The opposite direction is hard. Suppose I have ##N## as source manifold and ##f:N\rightarrow S## is the injective...
Back
Top