Product of Groups: Understand Max Subgroups & Taking the Product of Groups

  • Thread starter Thread starter DanielThrice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Product
DanielThrice
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding the product of groups and their max normal subgroups. What does it mean to be a max subgroup? How do I take the product of two groups?
How do I do it for something like S7 X Z7 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's just the cartesian product (like you can make out of any collection of sets), and the group operation on the product is done componentwise, using the operation from each factor group. Surely this definition is in your textbook.

A maximal (normal) subgroup is a (normal) subgroup not properly contained in another proper (normal) subgroup. Note in particular this does not imply that a maximal normal subgroup contains every other normal subgroup.
 
This is my first post on this forum, so I hope I don't break any rules and give you too much help for your homework :p

But I remember being very confused when I first bumped into the direct product of groups.

If we start with the basic definition: If A and B are both groups then A x B = {(a,b) | a \in A, b\in B}, so it is the set of all (a,b) where a is in A and b is in B.

then for example to find Z2 x Z3:

we know {0,1} is Z2 and {0,1,2} is Z3
so Z2 x Z3 is the set of all (a,b) where a is in {0,1} and b is in {0,1,2}
therefore Z2 x Z3 = {(0,0), (0,1), (0,2), (1,0), (1,1), (1,2)}

obviously this is very clumsy and long, so if you're working with direct products it's useful to note that when Zn x Zm, if n and m are coprime then Zn x Zm is isomorphic to Znm.

So in the example above, Z2 x Z3 is isomorphic to Z6.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top