News Progress in Afghanistan: What's Next After 6 Years of War?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the complexities of the situation in Afghanistan, emphasizing the need for a coherent strategic plan to secure democracy and stability. Significant progress is noted, including economic growth, improved healthcare access, and increased educational enrollment. However, challenges persist, particularly regarding the Taliban's influence and the geopolitical dynamics involving NATO and neighboring countries. The historical context of U.S. involvement, including past support for the mujahedin, is examined, raising questions about the long-term consequences of such actions. Overall, while there are signs of progress, the path to lasting success in Afghanistan remains uncertain.
  • #101
August was the worst month so far in Afghanistan for coalition fatalities - 77 (72 from hostile action), total coalition fatalities now since the 2001 invasion: 1409.
http://www.icasualties.org/OEF/ByMonth.aspx

Also I had thought most of the fighting was occurring along the eastern border provinces, or in Kandahar, when by far the largest share of fatalities is the in southern province of http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/afghanistan_rel_2003.jpg" fatalities. Edit: Since the US launched a major offensive in Helmand in July to take back some areas/towns from the Taliban before the August election, its likely many of these Helmand fatalities were recent and from the US Marines, who staged the Helmand offensive.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #102
Staff Sgt. Jered Monti, 30, was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor Thursday Sept 17 by President Obama for his actions on 21 June, 2006 in which he was killed.
2924.jpg

Sgt. Monti is the second CMOH recipient in the Afghanistan war.

"[URL
Remarks by President Obama[/URL]
http://www.history.army.mil/html/moh/afghanistan.html"

The incident took place in http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&sou...35.32633,70.905762&spn=6.353102,9.876709&z=7"province along the eastern border with Pakistan.

More bio from WSJ
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/AFGHANISTAN-CASUALTY-COUNT.html
Sgt. 1st Class Jared Christopher Monti
Age: 30
Hometown: Raynham, Mass.
Died: Thursday, June 22, 2006

Jared C. Monti seemed to always put the needs of others before his own.
While serving in South Korea, he was swept down a river after testing a crossing to make sure it was safe. In Kosovo, he picked up a group of Albanian kids who were being harassed by Serbs and drove them to school. He never went home for Christmas or Thanksgiving because he wanted the married guys to be with their families.
"We use to send him care packages, and he would give them to all the kids," said his brother, Tim. "He carried candy around in his pocket for them, and he would tell us how he would give kids rides in the Humvee because they were scared to walk across town."
Monti, 30, of Raynham, Mass., was killed June 21 by small-arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades in Gowardesh. He was assigned to Fort Drum.
He joined the Army immediately after he graduated high school in 1994 to make enough money to go to college. He wanted to be a fifth-grade teacher.
He is survived by his parents, Paul and Janet.
"He was just a kid that liked people and did a lot of things quietly. He was a very humble boy," said his father.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #103
Nurestan photo from Reuters photographer Oleg Popov

0825pod03.jpg

"A U.S. soldier wounded by sniper fire was evacuated by his comrades in the village of Bargematal, Nuristan province, Afghanistan, on Tuesday. (Oleg Popov/Reuters)"

Barge Matal village again, photo from Army Sgt Matther Moeller.

3724534518_704359dd96.jpg


Flikr photo set from unknown US unit.
http://www.flickr.com/groups/1026311@N20/pool/with/3940306853/Interactive events map of day to day events in Pakistan (subscription?)
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-AFGHANISTANPAKISTANHOTSPOTS09.html
 
Last edited:
  • #104
PBS Frontline's rolling out their Afghanistan piece.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamaswar/"

Background links:
http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/Assessment_Redacted_092109.pdf" , leaked by WaPo. September 2009
http://www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/afghanistan_pakistan_white_paper_final.pdf"
"[URL
Summary of Army Report on major Counter Insurgency failure[/URL], Tom Ricks (WaPo reporter and author of Fiasco), Foreign Policy Magazine, July 23, 2009
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-on-a-New-Strategy-for-Afghanistan-and-Pakistan/" , March 27, 2009
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/swm/index.htm" , 1940

Multimedia link to the big June 11 CNAS think tank panel discussion referenced in the Front Line video.
http://www.cnas.org/june2009
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #105
September US fatalities declined a bit from August. Most of the Septembers have shown declines.
http://www.icasualties.org/OEF/ByMonth.aspx
Helmand province seems to have more than its share of the violence, as it's had 10 fatalities alone since Sept 22.
 
  • #106
mheslep said:
August was the worst month so far in Afghanistan for coalition fatalities - 77 (72 from hostile action), total coalition fatalities now since the 2001 invasion: 1409.
http://www.icasualties.org/OEF/ByMonth.aspx

Also I had thought most of the fighting was occurring along the eastern border provinces, or in Kandahar, when by far the largest share of fatalities is the in southern province of http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/afghanistan_rel_2003.jpg" fatalities. Edit: Since the US launched a major offensive in Helmand in July to take back some areas/towns from the Taliban before the August election, its likely many of these Helmand fatalities were recent and from the US Marines, who staged the Helmand offensive.

That was 301 coalition fatalities in Helmand, with only 89 US fatalities, since 2001.
The United Kingdom has had 190 fatalities in Helmand province, about 93% of their total losses in Afghanistan. I have a friend in the UK army in Afghanistan at this moment; odds are that's where he is stationed.

I see the Canadians are similarly concentrated next door in Kandahar province, with ~90% of their losses there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #107
http://www.cnas.org/node/3448

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamaswar/

McCrystal wants more troops. Others want to keep the level as is.

From Slate - Administration Officials: Taliban Could Become Like Hezbollah. And That's OK.

It should hardly come as a shock to anyone who has been following the debate on Afghanistan strategy, but after six hours of debate among senior national security advisers, the administration seems well on its way to what the Los Angeles Times calls a "subtle shift" in strategy. Al-Qaida has, of course, been considered an enemy all along. But whereas the Taliban used to be seen as a close ally that supported the enemy's ambitions, now the White House is taking great effort to make sure the public understands they're not one and the same. The Taliban are seen more as a local group that could eventually become like Hezbollah — a terrorist organization that is a political force and causes instability in the region but is not a threat to the United States. The new strategy would weaken the Taliban, leaving them unable to take over the government or give safe haven to al-Qaida, without destroying them. As the Wall Street Journal points out, changing the focus of the war could give the White House the justification it needs to increase the number of troops in Afghanistan either by a small number or not at all—no one is advocating a troop decrease—while still ostensibly following Gen. Stanely McChrystal's advice. It was revealed yesterday that McChrystal's request to Obama for additional troops included an option of adding more than 60,000 troops. This is news because, so far, 40,000 was always talked about as the highest figure. Now it seems 40,000 additional troops is the middle of three options, and is seen as the primary choice of senior military officers. Obama will discuss the specific numbers with his advisers for the first time today. The LAT says Obama is "at least a week away" from making any kind of decision.
The problem is that under the Taliban, the people - those without weapons or protection - suffered under the Taliban or Warlords.

The Taliban and al Qaida have formed an amorphous alliance, and both drift across the Pakistan/Afghanistan border. The Taliban were primarily Pashtun Afghanis displaced during the Russian incursion into Afghanistan. Now they are a larger group that includes many subgroups, some of which might have aspirations or jihad against perceived enemies - primarily the US.

And if that is not a concern then think about this
The IED: Weapon of Choice - washingtonpost.com
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2007/09/26/VI2007092601410.html

How long before IED's are used in US metropolitan areas?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #108
  • #109
mheslep said:
This last bit is not coherent. Look at why IED's are used in Afghanistan, and what's required to make them.
It's based on a comment made by one of the people in the video. Materials to make IEDs are readily available in the US or can be brought in via any of the illicit smuggling/trafficking operations.
 
  • #110
Astronuc said:
It's based on a comment made by one of the people in the video.
Yes by the WaPo reporter, who just says 'many people' say we'll see them here. That's a silly comment imo
Materials to make IEDs are readily available in the US or can be brought in via any of the illicit smuggling/trafficking operations.

No the 'materials' are not readily available here, the important material being the explosives, not the triggering device. The number one source for IED explosives in Iraq is artillery ordinance, which is widely available there. In the US (and I expect elsewhere), explosives are extremely tightly controlled since 911 including the base materials. Yes, explosives can still be had with difficulty, but if the primary goal was simply to cause maximum random mayhem via explosives then then most effective route is to plant them in or alongside a building or other confined space, as history as unfortunately shown. No doubt it will happen again in the US sooner or later. However, for purposes of random violence it is incoherent to put such a device on the side of the road where most of its energy is dissipated as 'IEDs' are, unless the primary goal is to attack patrolling military forces because that is the only place they are accessible, and used that way they unfortunately have tactical value.
 
Last edited:
  • #112
mheslep said:
Yes by the WaPo reporter, who just says 'many people' say we'll see them here. That's a silly comment imo

No the 'materials' are not readily available here, the important material being the explosives, not the triggering device. The number one source for IED explosives in Iraq is artillery ordinance, which is widely available there. In the US (and I expect elsewhere), explosives are extremely tightly controlled since 911 including the base materials.
One can easily purchase materials on the 'global black market' in Central Asia, Africa, S. America, . . . . and given the illicit substances that are readily available on the streets of most metropolitan and suburban areas in the US - it's not as hard as one would imagine. Actually, explosive materials have been under stricture control since 1995 and Timothy McVeigh's bombing in Oklahoma April 19, 1995, which is interesting given the bombing at the WTC on February 26, 1993.

I would also recommend reading Steve Coll's Ghost Wars.

The big concern since about 1985 has been that militant groups would strike back at the US. The term is called 'blowback'. Unfortunately, successive administrations pretty much ignored those concerns - until September 11, 2001.
 
  • #113
Astronuc said:
One can easily purchase materials on the 'global black market' in Central Asia, Africa, S. America, . . . . and given the illicit substances that are readily available on the streets of most metropolitan and suburban areas in the US - it's not as hard as one would imagine.
What do you mean? That US residents can easily buy explosives on the black market overseas and get them into the US? What do you base this on? Transportation hubs now commonly have electronic explosives detectors, not electronic narcotics detectors.
Actually, explosive materials have been under stricture control since 1995 and Timothy McVeigh's bombing in Oklahoma April 19, 1995, which is interesting given the bombing at the WTC on February 26, 1993.
Since the http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/804496/posts" Yousef's fertilizer truck bomb is going to be quite a bit harder to repeat. Even so, I doubt fertilizer is very suitable for man powerful portable explosives. An individual would do much more damage w/ a firearm I expect.

I would also recommend reading Steve Coll's Ghost Wars.
Why? Does Coll suggest as you do that there is a waive of explosives coming into that IED's could be common in 'US metropolitan areas' as you have?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #114
mheslep said:
What do you mean? That US residents can easily buy explosives on the black market overseas and get them into the US?
The IRA never seemed to have much trouble moving them in the other direction - and security in Northern Ireland went a lot further than taking nail clippers off you at the airport.

Transportation hubs now commonly have electronic explosives detectors,
They swab a few peoples hands, they don't strip down every container and open every package. 20,000 containers arrive in the US everyday - shouldn't be impossible to get a few kg of C4 in that.

Since the http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/804496/posts" Yousef's fertilizer truck bomb is going to be quite a bit harder to repeat.
But not impossible there is still a lot of Ammonium nitrate and fuel oil sold in the US

Even so, I doubt fertilizer is very suitable for man powerful portable explosives. An individual would do much more damage w/ a firearm I expect.
Not much use in a IED, but a truck full makes a mess. It's also very easy to detonate.
Best source for an IED is military explosives/munitions. You would need a country with many 1000s of military bases in remote areas with many miles of poorly guarded fences and forgotten about stores.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #115
mgb_phys said:
The IRA never seemed to have much trouble moving them in the other direction - and security in Northern Ireland went a lot further than taking nail clippers off you at the airport...
We're not talking about Northern Ireland or anywhere else with a full blown insurrection / civil war under-way. If we did IED's would not be on the top of my worry list.

Again: The topic was not what might happen one or twice, or how once or twice someone would go to great lengths and risk to obtain a one time 1-2kg of C4 (which is a silly risk, when opening a gas line is much simpler and as effective). The US already had once or twice, and they'll be more. The suggestion was that IEDs, that is, common and easy to obtain explosive devices, would widely appear in the US, circa 2009, despite an ATF, an FBI, new explosives restrictions, and new explosives electronics detectors at border entries.
 
Last edited:
  • #116
  • #117
One [More] Death in Afghanistan: Ben Sklaver's Story
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1930683,00.html
Last week, Laura and Gary Sklaver buried their oldest boy, Ben, who was 32 when killed by a suicide bomber in the remote village of Murcheh in the distant land of Afghanistan. Ben was a captain in the U.S. Army. Now he has become one of 804 Americans, 37 from Connecticut, to lose their lives in an expanding war that belongs mostly to the parents and families of those who serve a nation preoccupied by a wounded economy and political polarization.
. . . .
Ben Sklaver grew up drawn to service. He admired his grandfather, who served with George Patton's Army in World War II. He joined ROTC at Tufts, received a master's in international relations from the Fletcher School of Diplomacy, was commissioned as an officer in the Army Reserve in 2003 and became convinced that a world consumed with conflict and terrorism might be changed by Americans bringing clean water, medicine and food as much as by drones, missiles and military might.
. . . .

In memory of Cpt Benjamin Sklaver - http://www.clearwaterinitiative.org/benjamin/

Projects - http://www.clearwaterinitiative.org/Projects/projects.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #118
Astronuc said:
One [More] Death in Afghanistan: Ben Sklaver's Story
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1930683,00.html
Thanks for the Sklaver story Astronuc. That village appears to be in mostly trouble free province of Bamyan, so this is unexpected there.

I do object to Time's rendering of the story. The closing:
...two more casualties of a war waged by the forgotten few.
They are not forgotten by me.
 
  • #119
mheslep said:
Thanks for the Sklaver story Astronuc. That village appears to be in mostly trouble free province of Bamyan, so this is unexpected there.

I do object to Time's rendering of the story. The closing:

They are not forgotten by me.
Bamiyan or Bamyan is home of the Hazaras, who may be more amenable to the US presence. Unfortunately, Taliban or Taliban/al Qaida sympathizers seem to move throughout the country.

I wish US and ISAF troops weren't in that situation, but the alternative of just up an leaving would allow for worse situation.

Some of the Taliban may be very focused locally or provincially, but the Taliban have evolved under the influence of foreign entities like al-Qaida, Jamaat-E-Islami, Hezb-e Islami, and similar organizations. The situation has become more dire in Pakistan, and both Pakistan and Afghanistan face the same insurgency more or less.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091016/wl_sthasia_afp/pakistanunrest

Pakistan Attacks Show Tighter Militant Links
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/16/world/asia/16pstan.html


The situation is a bit like fighting a wildfire with unpredictable winds.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #120
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8357011.stm
A 14-year-old boy in the tribal region of Bajaur, in north-west Pakistan, says he was detained by Taliban forces who tried to turn him into a suicide bomber. The boy is now in army hands.

He provided a detailed account to BBC correspondent Orla Guerin. His story cannot be independently verified.
 
  • #121
rootX said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8357011.stm
That's some story. His kidnappers seemed to have skipped the injunction in the Quran
against suicide. The Taliban (and Al Qaeda) appears to be little more than a group of megalomaniacs, a cult, using Islam as cover - something worth fighting.
 
  • #122
triks said:
opium production went up, that wasn't much but it's the progress that was made by Bush and Co..

So you have:
A trade deficit with China
You want stuff China exports
You don't make anything they want
You have a weak currency and they want paying in silver
Meanwhile you have a possession in the Indian sub-continent that grows opium.

A historical solution does seem to present itself.
 
  • #123
I plotted the US/UK fatalities by month and year below. Let's hope November brings quiet to Afghanistan as it has in past years.
http://www.icasualties.org/OEF/ByMonth.aspx

US:
2hq5k4o.jpg


UK:
rj312w.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • #124
Something that apparently works in Afghanistan.

National Solidarity Programme

The National Solidarity Programme (NSP) was created in 2003 by the Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development to develop the ability of Afghan communities to identify, plan, manage and monitor their own development projects. Through the promotion of good local governance, the NSP works to empower rural communities to make decision affecting their own lives and livelihoods. Empowered rural communities collectively contribute to increased human security. The programme is inclusive, supporting entire communities including the poorest and vulnerable people.
http://www.nspafghanistan.org/
 
  • #125
I'm wondering how exactly everyone feels about the current situation in Afghanistan. Actually I'd love to be brought 'more up-to-date' on what's actually going on if anyone has a recent article they could share with me.

I have no idea if these points have been brought up sorry if it has I just skimmed through it.
The way I see it is that it's great that countries are going in and supporting rebuilding the country and supporting the people. However this is an environment that is going to be used against the troops in a war. For instance I recal watching on CNN a story about a base that was near the pakistan border and was ambushed HEAVILY only 2 soldiers survived from the entire base and they were pinned down for quite some time before reinforcements could come and land.

I assume that America's target is mostly to get rid of the terrorist and continue their war on terror however we should look at this area's history. They have been constantly at war and they do really well on home turf :-p I have no doubt in my mind that America given enough strength in Afghanistan could destroy every sign of terrorist in the region and guard it. Will it be worth it to get to that point though?

Maybe we should instead focus more on building the urban areas and helping the people of the country instead of attempting to eliminate the terrorist along the borders? If you look on youtube for videos of battles between Americans on the borderland you will probably be quite shocked by how well the enemy is able to fight. They even do recon missions with the Americans having any idea until they find videotapes.

I guess what I'm saying is that maybe we should ease off the border (it's an extremely difficult area to defend) and focus more on the internal system of Afghanistan. Maybe that will be more rewarding? (I.e. Winning over the people of the country so they no longer support or help the terrorist?)

I've enlisted in the military, Canadian, I have to go through all my testings etc. in a little bit and I would love to go over there to know we are helping and making a difference to the Afghan people lives now.

This could all be wrong however as my views are mostly based on reports from just before the summertime, so it's obviously probable that things have changed since then.
 
  • #126
I think we'd need to send about ten times the troops Obama is sending to make a real difference. Granted, it seems politically impossible to do that, and hence I'd prefer we just get out now, as I don't expect the current course of action to accomplish anything notable.
 
  • #127
Sorry! said:
I'm wondering how exactly everyone feels about the current situation in Afghanistan. Actually I'd love to be brought 'more up-to-date' on what's actually going on if anyone has a recent article they could share with me.

I have no idea if these points have been brought up sorry if it has I just skimmed through it.
The way I see it is that it's great that countries are going in and supporting rebuilding the country and supporting the people. However this is an environment that is going to be used against the troops in a war. For instance I recal watching on CNN a story about a base that was near the pakistan border and was ambushed HEAVILY only 2 soldiers survived from the entire base and they were pinned down for quite some time before reinforcements could come and land.

I assume that America's target is mostly to get rid of the terrorist and continue their war on terror however we should look at this area's history. They have been constantly at war and they do really well on home turf :-p I have no doubt in my mind that America given enough strength in Afghanistan could destroy every sign of terrorist in the region and guard it. Will it be worth it to get to that point though?

Maybe we should instead focus more on building the urban areas and helping the people of the country instead of attempting to eliminate the terrorist along the borders? If you look on youtube for videos of battles between Americans on the borderland you will probably be quite shocked by how well the enemy is able to fight. They even do recon missions with the Americans having any idea until they find videotapes.

I guess what I'm saying is that maybe we should ease off the border (it's an extremely difficult area to defend) and focus more on the internal system of Afghanistan. Maybe that will be more rewarding? (I.e. Winning over the people of the country so they no longer support or help the terrorist?)

I've enlisted in the military, Canadian, I have to go through all my testings etc. in a little bit and I would love to go over there to know we are helping and making a difference to the Afghan people lives now.

This could all be wrong however as my views are mostly based on reports from just before the summertime, so it's obviously probable that things have changed since then.

One thing I think is a bit silly is the notion that we are going to "break the will" of the enemy. We are not. They will fight to the last man. The only way to get rid of them is to kill all of them and make sure there are no new recruits.
 
  • #128
Galteeth said:
One thing I think is a bit silly is the notion that we are going to "break the will" of the enemy. We are not. They will fight to the last man. The only way to get rid of them is to kill all of them and make sure there are no new recruits.

The common people of Afghanistan are not our enemy. Why should we focus our energy on getting rid of our enemies in the area when:
A)It will require a lot more man-power than currently available.
B)It will require a lot more force than it looks like any country involved is ready to bring to the war.
C)We probably will never succeed in the mission of destroying the enemy even if we try
and
D)We will never win over the regular society of Afghanistan by constantly fighting wars and bringing the violence home to them. SURE there was already violence there but the Taliban, for instance, will go into towns and steal, threaten, beat up people to make sure they do not relay information to the troops... sometimes they even just chill in towns waiting to ambush troops and then just run away normally destroying the village, civillian deaths get involved.
 
  • #129
Sorry! said:
I'm wondering how exactly everyone feels about the current situation in Afghanistan. Actually I'd love to be brought 'more up-to-date' on what's actually going on if anyone has a recent article they could share with me...
See up thread #105, those sources will fill you in quite well.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2374114&postcount=105

Sorry said:
I assume that America's target is mostly to get rid of the terrorist and continue their war on terror however we should look at this area's history.
That's the Counter Terrorism strategy, and was rejected by McCrystal for Afghanistan, who did Counter Terror quite well in Iraq. The plan now is Counter Insurgency, a very different concept, which the President has now endorsed (at least for a couple years).
 
Last edited:
  • #130
With regards to the number of troops, and the usual 1:50 COIN rule of thumb:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120274965
Max Boot said:
It's true that the Army/Marine COIN Manual suggests a figure of 1 counterinsurgent per 50 civilians as a rough rule of thumb. It's also true that Afghanistan has roughly 30 million people, so that if you apply that ratio you get a requirement for 600,000 security personnel. That's far more than are currently deployed: There are about 100,000 foreign troops (68,000 of them American) and 180,000 Afghan security personnel.

Getting to 600,000 is daunting but not impossible; Iraq has done it. However the real size of the immediate requirement is smaller because the insurgency is concentrated among the Pashtuns who form half the population, or roughly 15 million people. If you apply the ratio to Pashtuns only, you get a requirement of 300,000 security personnel. That's more in the ballpark of what American and Afghan resources can provide in the near future.
 
  • #131
mheslep said:
See up thread #105, those sources will fill you in quite well.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2374114&postcount=105

That's the Counter Terrorism strategy, and was rejected by McCrystal for Afghanistan, who did Counter Terror quite well in Iraq. The plan now is Counter Insurgency, a very different concept, which the President has now endorsed (at least for a couple years).

Thanks.

This counter-insurgency seems much closer to what I would expect to occur in an area such as Afghanistan. I wasn't aware that's currently what they are doing.
 
Last edited:
  • #132
I was particularly interested in this part of the US President's speech this week:

Obama said:
...[Afghanistan and Pakistan are] the epicenter of violent extremism practiced by al Qaeda. It is from here that we were attacked on 9/11, and it is from here that new attacks are being plotted as I speak. This is no idle danger; no hypothetical threat. In the last few months alone, we have apprehended extremists within our borders who were sent here from the border region of Afghanistan and Pakistan to commit new acts of terror...
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-address-nation-way-forward-afghanistan-and-pakistan

That is indeed no idle security threat, a serious reminder of why NATO forces are engaged there. I had heard nothing about new extremists entering the country. Anyone have details on the event(s) he is referring to there?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #133
mheslep said:
I was particularly interested in this part of the US President's speech this week:


http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-address-nation-way-forward-afghanistan-and-pakistan

That is indeed no idle security threat, a serious reminder of why NATO forces are engaged there. I had heard nothing about new extremists entering the country. Anyone have details on the event(s) he is referring to there?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32916251/
That's the only event I can think about that's been made public at least. However this person is an American citizen who was on a trip IIRC.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #134
Sorry! said:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32916251/
That's the only event I can think about that's been made public at least. However this person is an American citizen who was on a trip IIRC.

Thanks, I've googled around too

This
Zazi, 24, was born in Afghanistan in 1985, moved to Pakistan at age 7 and emigrated to the United States in 1999
doesn't match up with threats described by Obama.
 
  • #136
  • #137
mheslep said:
Have you read it Rootx? I'd appreciate any comments.

I just heard about it today on the radio.
 
  • #138
Monday Afghan President Karzai hosted Iran's Ahmadinejad in his palace, where he gave his predictably lame stream of attacks on the US. This was done apparently in response to a US snubbing after Karzai torpedoed the election investigation. Karzai now supposedly displays classic fearless leader syndrome:
He believes that America is trying to dominate the region, and that he is the only one who can stand up to them.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/30/world/asia/30karzai.html?ref=asia

Usually my opinion would be tough luck for the US and allies, as the Afghan people are the only ones who have the right to choose their leadership. But this time the Afghans didn't choose Karzai; this former Maitre D in a Baltimore restaurant stole the election. Obama / McCrystal should throw the bastard on (or under) the next passing train, and hold a real election.
 
  • #140
Wouldn't it be best to get the *bleep* out of Afghanistan, the sooner the better?
All these years and all that waste of money and life - and achieving funk-all. Nada. Zip. Zilch. NOTHING!
 
  • #141
Max Faust said:
Wouldn't it be best to get the *bleep* out of Afghanistan, the sooner the better?
All these years and all that waste of money and life - and achieving funk-all. Nada. Zip. Zilch. NOTHING!

Errr, sources?
 
  • #142
Max Faust said:
Wouldn't it be best to get the *bleep* out of Afghanistan, the sooner the better?
All these years and all that waste of money and life - and achieving funk-all. Nada. Zip. Zilch. NOTHING!

Oh wow. April fools?

Perhaps you haven't read about the progress in Marjah, or the 50+ top Taliban leaders captured in the past 2 months. We are finally getting the push we need, and I believe Kandahar is next
 
  • #143
Getting to 600,000 is daunting but not impossible; Iraq has done it. However the real size of the immediate requirement is smaller because the insurgency is concentrated among the Pashtuns who form half the population, or roughly 15 million people. If you apply the ratio to Pashtuns only, you get a requirement of 300,000 security personnel. That's more in the ballpark of what American and Afghan resources can provide in the near future.
So have a security force consisting of the ruling tribe 'A' large enough to overwhelm the civilians of tribe 'B' who you assume are all suspected terrorists.

Then resolve to get tough and crush the terrorists and all the other things you promise before elections - worked out well everywhere else it's been done.
 
  • #144
MotoH said:
the progress in Marjah, or the 50+ top Taliban leaders captured

We must have quite different standards for what constitutes a military achievement then.
You can spend five hundred frakkin' years in Afghanistan and still achieve nothing. Sure, you can blow up some houses and kill some rugged goat-herders here and there but the only real change that has happened in Afghanistan since 2001 is that they are now the world's number one heroin manufacturer again. Good job!
 
  • #145
Max Faust said:
the only real change that has happened in Afghanistan since 2001 is that they are now the world's number one heroin manufacturer again. Good job!
But most of the people it kills are Russians so we win.
At the moment 85% of Afghanistan's heroin is exported to Iran, the only thing stopping most of it reaching europe is that Iran has a somewhat zealous attitude to stopping drug smugglers.
Odd that they want to play at being a nuclear power when if they want to kill 1000s of westerners a year all they have to do is to cut their anti-smuggling program.

No doubt once we get around to to democratizilating Iran (watch for around $150/barrel) that interruption to international trade will be removed.
 
  • #146
mgb_phys said:
85% of Afghanistan's heroin is exported to Iran

Speaking of Iran, has it passed completely under the radar that Hamid Karzai recently had a meeting with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad where they discussed future relations with regards to the project of rebuilding Afghanistan? It's REALLY REALLY hard to see who else but Iran that stands to gain from the Bush wars. (Considering that the political majority of the Iraqi people are Iran-friendly shi'ites.) So yes, that sure was a well-spent trillion dollars.
 
  • #147
It's all good, the U.S. gets it's share of the worlds prescription heroine.

"Of all countries, the United States had the highest total consumption of oxycodone in 2007 (82% of the world total of 51.6 tons)."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxycodone#Clinical_use

That ought to be enough for us to get our fix.
 
  • #149
Max Faust said:
Wouldn't it be best to get the *bleep* out of Afghanistan, the sooner the better?
All these years and all that waste of money and life - and achieving funk-all. Nada. Zip. Zilch. NOTHING!
Please don't derail this two year old thread..
 
Last edited:
  • #150
mgb_phys said:
So have a security force consisting of the ruling tribe 'A' large enough to overwhelm the civilians of tribe 'B' who you assume are all suspected terrorists.

Then resolve to get tough and crush the terrorists and all the other things you promise before elections - worked out well everywhere else it's been done.
Visibly counter-insurgency worked in Iraq. You know this. Why the counter factual sarcasm?
 

Similar threads

News Should the US intervene in world problems?
Replies
29
Views
10K
News Is War Sometimes Necessary to Achieve Peace?
Replies
9
Views
4K
News Renaissance and reaction to Islam.
Replies
49
Views
7K
News Ahmadinejad's speech at Durban II
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • Poll Poll
News Is the CIA a Terrorist Organization?
Replies
8
Views
5K
News Article : The Shadow War : Euro vs. Dollar
Replies
31
Views
6K
News Bravo Europe Union, Shame on you France, Damn the Chinese are smooth
Replies
21
Views
4K
News How long until the left labels Zell Miller a traitor?
Replies
27
Views
5K
News Bush Administration: My Indictment
Replies
3
Views
3K
News Is a Major Overhaul of the US Government Possible? Feedback Wanted!
Replies
11
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top