Projectile motion and angular motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two main questions regarding projectile and angular motion. For projectile motion, the user seeks to understand how to derive motion equations after hitting a ball at an angle, starting from the velocity equation v = √(2gh). In angular motion, the user is confused about the significance of the direction of angular velocity (ω) and its relation to the ball's movement, clarified by the right-hand rule indicating the axis of rotation. The conversation also touches on Newton's second law, emphasizing that the position vector (r) represents the center of mass in relation to an inertial reference system. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of motion equations and the principles governing rotational dynamics.
abdul
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I have two questions which I have been pondering on and I just can't figure it out. Maybe someone could be kind enough to answer the questions?

Q1; Projectile motion: Let's say we dropped a ball from a height called h.
We achieve a velocity v=\sqrt{2gh}. Let's then say that we hit the ball in differently angle with a paddle. What will the motion equations become?

Q2: Angular motion: Let's say we have a ball in vaacum. We make this ball rotate. Then this ball achieves angular velocity, the direction of the angular velocity \omega can be found by the right-hand rule. But I am confused, what does the angular velocity's direction tell us? It it where the ball will move towards?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
abdul said:
Hi.

I have two questions which I have been pondering on and I just can't figure it out. Maybe someone could be kind enough to answer the questions?

Q1; Projectile motion: Let's say we dropped a ball from a height called h.
We achieve a velocity v=\sqrt{2gh}. Let's then say that we hit the ball in differently angle with a paddle. What will the motion equations become?

Solve the system

m\frac{d^{2}\vec{r}}{dt^{2}}=m\vec{g}

with the initial conditions that u wish to impose...

abdul said:
Q2: Angular motion: Let's say we have a ball in vaacum. We make this ball rotate. Then this ball achieves angular velocity, the direction of the angular velocity \omega can be found by the right-hand rule. But I am confused, what does the angular velocity's direction tell us? It it where the ball will move towards?

Thank you.

Nope.If the ball just rotates around a fix axis (for simplicity),then the direction of \vec{\omega} will be along the rotation axis and,incidentally,the angular momentum \vec{L} will have the same direction.So yes,i the ball doesn't translate,then specifying the modulus,sense & direction of either \vec{L} or \vec{\omega} will completely determine the movement,in case the ball is not acted on by any force (except gravity which would give a zero torque under normal conditions)...

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Solve the system

m\frac{d^{2}\vec{r}}{dt^{2}}=m\vec{g}

with the initial conditions that u wish to impose...

I'm sorry to ask again. But I didn't understand your answer. How did you achieve that equation, could you show me? What is \vec{r}? Is it the radius of the ball? Let's say I impose initial conditions as none friction and none air resistance. How will the equation turn out then?

Thank you for the answer of Q2.
 
It's the II-nd law of Newton for translation movement...Mass times acceleration is equal to the vector sum of all forces acting on the body.In this case,it's only gravity.That \vec{r} is the position vector for the CM of the body wrt an inertial reference system.

Daniel.
 
Thank you for your help, Daniel. I appreciate it.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top