Projectile Motion balloon question

AI Thread Summary
A 124-kg balloon descends at a constant speed of 23.5 m/s while a 1.0-kg stone is thrown from a basket with an initial velocity of 14.8 m/s perpendicular to the balloon's path. The stone hits the ground 6.20 seconds later, prompting calculations to determine the balloon's height when the stone was thrown. Initial calculations incorrectly assumed the stone's initial vertical velocity was the same as the balloon's, leading to confusion about the direction of motion. The correct approach involves recognizing the stone's vertical motion is influenced by gravity, and using time and relative acceleration simplifies the calculations. Ultimately, the balloon's height was determined to be approximately 188 meters when the stone was released.
Elvis 123456789
Messages
158
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


A 124-kg balloon carrying a 22-kg basket is descending with a constant downward velocity of 23.5m/s A 1.0-kg stone is thrown from the basket with an initial velocity of 14.8m/s perpendicular to the path of the descending balloon, as measured relative to a person at rest in the basket. The person in the basket sees the stone hit the ground 6.20s after being thrown. Assume that the balloon continues its downward descent with the same constant speed of 23.5m/s.

How high was the balloon when the rock was thrown out?

Homework Equations


ΔY=V1y*t + 1/2*a*t^2

The Attempt at a Solution


At first I thought since the stone is being thrown off the balloon which is going at a constant speed of 23.5m/s, then the stone's initial Y velocity must also be 23.5m/s, and since its being thrown perpendicular to the balloon's path at 14.8m/s, then that must be its initial X velocity.

I figure that the balloon's height when the stone was thrown out, is the same as the stone's initial position. And the stone's final position is 0 at t=6.20 s since its on the ground.

So I used the above equation
ΔY=V1y*t + 1/2*a*t^2

0-y1=V1y*t - 1/2*g*t^2

y1= -[(23.5m/s)(6.20s)-(4.9m/s^2)(6.20s)^2
y1=47.356m

but this isn't right and I don't know why
 
  • Like
Likes jongo said
Physics news on Phys.org
It says 'perpendicular to the path of the descending balloon'. What direction does that make it?
 
oh wow ok. The initial Y velocity is negative. I got 334m
 
  • Like
Likes jongo said
Just before the rock hits the ground, find its horizontal and vertical velocity components as measured by an observer at rest in the basket.

I'm having trouble figuring out the above part. I know the X velocity is constant, but i don't know how to get the Y velocity. I tried using the equation V^2=V1^2 + 2aΔY

V^2=(-23.5m/s)^2 -2*(9.8m/s^2)*188m

and i know this is wrong so idk
 
  • Like
Likes jongo said
Elvis 123456789 said:
oh wow ok. The initial Y velocity is negative. I got 334m
yes, that looks about right.
 
  • Like
Likes jongo said
Elvis 123456789 said:
Just before the rock hits the ground, find its horizontal and vertical velocity components as measured by an observer at rest in the basket.

I'm having trouble figuring out the above part. I know the X velocity is constant, but i don't know how to get the Y velocity. I tried using the equation V^2=V1^2 + 2aΔY

V^2=(-23.5m/s)^2 -2*(9.8m/s^2)*188m

and i know this is wrong so idk
What was the y velocity relative to the person in the basket when the rock was thrown? What was the y acceleration relative to the basket?
 
  • Like
Likes jongo said
would it be

V^2=-2*(9.8m/s^2)*(-188m)
V=60.7 but it would be negative since the velocity is in the negative direction?
 
Elvis 123456789 said:
would it be

V^2=-2*(9.8m/s^2)*(-188m)
V=60.7 but it would be negative since the velocity is in the negative direction?
Where are you getting the 188m from?
 
  • Like
Likes jongo said
That's what I calculated for the Y displacement of the stone when it reached the ground, relative to the balloon.
 
  • Like
Likes jongo said
  • #10
Elvis 123456789 said:
That's what I calculated for the Y displacement of the stone when it reached the ground, relative to the balloon.
Ok. Yes, that's the right answer. Your method produces an ambiguity in the sign. You can avoid that (and the need to take a square root) by using the time and relative acceleration.
 
  • #11
Thank you, and your right that would've been a much easier way. I tend to over complicate things more than I should.
 
  • Like
Likes jongo said

Similar threads

Back
Top