Projectile Motion, different starting/ending height.

AI Thread Summary
Projectile motion can be analyzed using the quadratic equation to determine the range when given the angle, initial velocity, and height. In a specific example, an object launched at 8 m/s at a 40-degree angle from a height of 2.4 m was calculated to have a range of 8.3 m using the quadratic formula. Alternative methods attempted to bypass the quadratic equation led to incorrect results, highlighting the necessity of this approach for accurate calculations. The discussion emphasizes that finding the maximum height and total time of flight is crucial for determining the range effectively. Ultimately, the quadratic equation remains the most reliable method for solving projectile motion problems with varying heights.
TrueBlood
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If you are given the projectile angle, initial velocity, and height you can find the projectile range using the quadratic equation (solving for t). One thing I don't understand is why the quadratic equation seems to be the only way to solve these problems.

For instance, let's say an object is shot 8m/s, 40deg over the horizon, and at a height of 2.4 m. Now finding the range is straightforward.

(change in y) = Vot + 1/2at^2
-2.4 = Sin40*8*t + 1/2(-10)t^2
-2.4=5.12t + -5t^2
-5t^2+5.12t-2.4 = 0 This is the quadratic equation, which you solve for t


Now let's say you didn't want to use the quadratic equation.
(1) You know that the object travels 6.1 m in 1 sec.
Vf = Sin40*8 + (-10)t
0 = 5.12 -10t
tup = 0.5s
total projectile time (back to it's original starting height) = 1 s
.:. (change in x) = cos(40)*8*1s = 6.1 m
(2) Next let's find the velocity at the point, after 1 sec.
V(1 sec) = Sin(40)*8 + (-10)t
V(1 sec) = 5.12 -10
V(1 sec) = -4.88 This, of course, is the y-direction velocity only
(3) Now let's see what the final velocity is, at -2.4 m below it's starting point
V^2 = Vo^2 + 2a(change in y)
V^2 = (-4.88^2) + 2(-10)(-2.4) Vo is at the 1 second point, Vf is after that at a -2.4 height
V^2 = 23 - 48
V^2 = -25 Ok I get a negative number... no good, so I'll change it to a positive number even though that is mathematical sin :cool:
V = 5 m/s
(4) Now let's see how long it takes to get from -4.88 to -5m/s with gravity
Vf = Vo + at
-5 = -4.88 + (-10)t
t = 0.012
(5) Now add the calculated time (From 1 sec to end point) to the time it takes the projectile to get from starting point to 1 sec.
1 + 0.012 = TotalTime
(6) Now range is easy
(Change in x) = Cos40*8*1.012
(Change in x = 6.2 m

This of course is wrong :rolleyes: The actual time it adds to fall from 1sec to final-place is 0.372 sec (or 1.372 sec total). You get that with the quadratic equation... making the actual range 8.3 m.

So why doesn't my ingenious method of creating more work for myself not work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Figured out a way to do it.

First find the max height , then the time it takes to fall from the max height to the ground (so height above original place + 2.4). Then add that time with the time it takes to reach the top. Then simply find range.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top