Projectile Motion Experimental Error

AI Thread Summary
The experiment involved launching a steel ball at various angles and calculating launch speeds, resulting in a 2.8% percentage difference between the most varied values. Key qualitative reasons for experimental error include the potential impact of air drag, which was ignored in calculations, and inconsistencies in the manual spring launcher used, affecting shot consistency. Measurement errors were also suggested as a possible factor, although specific measurement methods were not detailed. The discussion highlights the importance of considering external factors and equipment reliability in projectile motion experiments. Overall, understanding these errors can improve future experimental accuracy.
realslow
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We carried out an experiment where we launched a steel ball at different degrees. We then calculated the launch speeds for each launch angle. We got a percentage difference of 2.8% between the "most different" values. What are two qualitative reasons for this error?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


For the calculations, we were told to ignore air drag. I think that is an error, but I'm not exactly sure because we did the experiment in the same place and environment. I probably need some clarification about air drag.
I also think the launcher was a problem because it didn't give us the most constant shots. It was one of those ones with a spring, and you had to manually work it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
realslow said:
We carried out an experiment where we launched a steel ball at different degrees. We then calculated the launch speeds for each launch angle.
[/QUOTE]
How did you do that? What did you base it on?
realslow said:
We got a percentage difference of 2.8% between the "most different" values. What are two qualitative reasons for this error?
[/QUOTE]
Well, you list one of them yourself, below
realslow said:
I also think the launcher was a problem because it didn't give us the most constant shots. It was one of those ones with a spring, and you had to manually work it.
Measurement error is another possible reason but it's hard to say since you have not said anything at all about how you measured anything.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top