Projectile Motion Problem - Solving for Alpha and Maximum Distance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a projectile motion problem to determine the angle alpha for maximum distance. The initial approach involves using the equations of motion to find the time the projectile hits the ground and then computing the maximum horizontal distance. A challenge arises when deriving a quartic expression in alpha that complicates the simplification process. An alternative method suggested is the use of Lagrange multipliers, which can effectively handle the constraints of the problem. This approach is noted to simplify the process and yield better results.
PhDorBust
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
Problem statement is here: http://www.phys.uri.edu/~gerhard/PHY520/wmex139.pdf

My approach:
y = -\frac{gt^2}{2} + v_0 cos( \alpha) t + h

Projectile hits ground at:
t_{gnd} = \frac{v_0 sin( \alpha ) + \sqrt{ v_0^2 sin^2 ( \alpha) + 2gh}}{g}

Now compute derivative of x and solve for alpha:
x_{max} = v_0 cos( \alpha) t_{gnd}
\frac{dx_{max}}{d \alpha} = 0

This last step where you solve for alpha is what buggers me. I get a huge quartic expression in alpha that does not simplify, I suspect the problem setter expects you to make some approximation but I can't figure it out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the first equation (the one for y), it should be sine.

I see where you're trying to go with your approach. And I think it would work, but maybe you should try a different approach.

Are you familiar with Lagrange multipliers? Because you've got y=0 as the constraint and x as the function to maximise. The functions x and y are each functions of both alpha and t, so the problem looks well suited to the method of Lagrange multipliers.
 
Worked like a charm, good idea.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top